Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

LAREDO PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents

GRAPHICLOGO

April 10, 20122, 2013

To the Stockholders of Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc.:

        You are invited to attend our 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at The Mayo Hotel, 115 W. 5th Street,the Thomas Gilcrease Museum, 1400 North Gilcrease Museum Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103,74127, on Wednesday,Thursday, May 16, 2012,2013, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time.

        Details of the business to be conducted at the meeting are described in the attached Notice of 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.

        We are mailing to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") instead of a paper copy of our Annual Report, which includes our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, Proxy Statement and proxy card. We believe this process allows us to provide stockholders with the information needed in connection with our Annual Meeting in a timely manner, while saving costs and conserving resources. The Notice contains instructions on how to access these documents over the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request a paper copy of the materials, if desired. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice should receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

        Your vote is important and we encourage you to vote whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Please either vote by telephone, over the Internet or sign, date and return the enclosedyour proxy card, infollowing the envelope provided, or you may vote by telephone orinstructions on the internet as described onNotice or proxy materials, so that your proxy card.shares will be represented. If you are a stockholder of record and plan to attend the meeting, you may also vote in person.

        Also enclosed is a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. I encourage you to read the Annual Report on Form 10-K for information about our performance in 2011.

        We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

 Sincerely,

 

 


GRAPHICGRAPHIC



Randy A. Foutch
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

LAREDO PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, INC.
15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

NOTICE OF 20122013 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TIME 3:00 p.m. Central Time on Wednesday,Thursday, May 16, 2012.2013

PLACE

 

The Mayo Hotel, 115 W. 5th Street,Thomas Gilcrease Museum, 1400 North Gilcrease Museum Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103.74127

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

 

(1) To elect ten members of the board of directors to hold office until the 20132014 annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

 

 

(2) To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered accounting firm.

 

 

(3) To hold an advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

 

(4) To hold an advisory vote determining the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers.



(5) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

RECORD DATE

 

You can vote if, at the close of business on March 23, 2012,20, 2013, you were a holder of record of our common stock.

PROXY VOTING

 

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are urged to vote promptly by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or, if you hold your shares in street name, by voting by phonetelephone at 1-800-776-9437 or over the internetInternet atwww.voteproxy.com (or if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by signing and returning the proxy card in the envelope provided).



IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 16, 20122013



        The Company's Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy cardour 2012 Annual Report, including the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, are available over the internetInternet athttp://www.amstock.com/ProxyServices/ViewMaterial.asp?CoNumber=17377.CoNumber =17377. Alternatively, if you did not receivereceived a paper copy of the proxy materials (which includesinclude the proxy card), you may request a papervote by signing and returning the proxy card which you may complete, signin the envelope provided.

        This Notice, Proxy Statement and return by mail.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
the form of proxy/voting instructions are first being sent or made available to stockholders on or about April 10, 20122, 2013.

April 2, 2013
Tulsa, Oklahoma
 



By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 


GRAPHICGRAPHIC





W. Mark WombleKenneth E. Dornblaser
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerGeneral Counsel and Secretary

Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page 

PROXY STATEMENT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

  1 

NOTE REGARDING OUR CORPORATE REORGANIZATION

  
78
 

ITEM ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  
8
9
 

DIRECTORS

  
910
 

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

  
1315
 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  
1416
 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  
1517
 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  
1517
 

Introduction

  1517 

Competitive BenchmarkingNamed Executive Officers

18

2012 Company Highlights

18

Summary of our Compensation Program

19

Process for Determining Executive Compensation

  19 

Elements of Compensation

  2021 

Employment, Severance or Change in Control Agreements

  2632 

Other Matters

  2633 

Summary CompensationCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

  2835

Summary Compensation

36 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 20112012

  29

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

2937 

Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

  3037 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20112012 Fiscal Year-End

  3240 

Registration Rights

  3340 

Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 20112012

  3341 

Pension Benefits

  3341 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

  3341 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

  3341 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table for Fiscal Year 20112012

  3443 

Compensation of Directors

  3645 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under 2011 Plan

  3748 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

  
38

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT


3848
 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

  
3848
 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  
4151
 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

  
4151
 

Code of Conduct and Business Ethics

  4252 

Board of Directors Leadership

  4252 

Communications with the Board of Directors

  4353 

Director Independence

  4353 

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

  4353 

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

  4353 

Oversight of Risk Management

  4453 

Attendance at Annual Meetings

  4454 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

  
4555
 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  
4657

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

57

Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Person Transactions

57

Gas Gathering and Processing Arrangement with Targa

58

Registration Rights

58

Other Related-Party Transactions

58

ITEM TWO: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

60

Audit and Other Fees

60 

i


Table of Contents

 
 Page 

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

46

Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Person Transactions


46

Corporate Reorganization

47

Acquisition of Broad Oak Energy, Inc. 

47

Gas Gathering and Processing Arrangement with Targa

47

Registration Rights

48

Other Related Party Transactions

48

ITEM TWO: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


49

Audit and Other Fees


49

ITEM THREE: ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  
50

ITEM FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE VOTES ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


51
61
 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

  
5262
 

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

  
5363
 

STOCKHOLDER LIST

  
5463
 

PROXY MATERIALS, ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER INFORMATION

  
5464
 

INTERNET AND PHONE VOTING

  
5464
 

ii


Table of Contents

LAREDO PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, INC.
15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

PROXY STATEMENT

2012
2013 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        The board of directors of Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us" or "our") requests your proxy for the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that will be held Wednesday,Thursday, May 16, 2012,2013, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time, at The Mayo Hotel, 115 W. 5th Street,the Thomas Gilcrease Museum, 1400 North Gilcrease Museum Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma 7410374127, (the "Annual Meeting"). By granting the proxy, you authorize the persons named on the proxy to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

        ThisIn accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Statement and form of proxy are beingMaterials ("Notice") will be mailed to most of our stockholders commencing on or about April 10, 2012. Our 20112, 2013. The Notice will include (i) instructions on how to access the Company's proxy materials electronically, (ii) the date, time and location of the Annual ReportMeeting, (iii) a description of the matters intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iv) a list of the materials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report"), which is not parthow a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the Company's proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the proxy card, and (vii) information about attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice, or request a printed set of the proxy solicitation materials is also enclosed.to be sent to them by following instructions on the Notice.

        If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Q.    Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 23, 2012,20, 2013, which we refer to as the "Record Date," are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 128,144,857129,362,696 shares of our common stock outstanding. Stockholders are entitled to cast one vote per share on each matter presented for consideration and action at the Annual Meeting.

Q.    What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

A.
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon the following matters:

(1)
Election of ten directors to our board of directors;

(2)
Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012;2013;

(3)
An advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers; and

(4)
An advisory vote determining the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers; and

(5)
Such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Table of Contents

Q.    Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A.
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are sending to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder's election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Q.    Why didn't I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

A.
We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to help reduce the costs we incur in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

Q.    Can I vote my stock by filling out and returning the Notice?

A.
No. However, the Notice will provide instructions on how to vote over the Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card or by submitting a ballot in person at the Annual Meeting.

Q.    How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

A.
Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at: www.laredopetro.com.

Table of Contents

Q.    How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Stockholders of Record.    If your shares are registered directly in your name with the American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, our "transfer agent," you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and the Notice or proxy materials being mailed to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the proxy card or vote using the ballot provided at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you decide later not to attend the Annual Meeting.


Beneficial Owners.    Most of our stockholders hold their shares in street name through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. In that case, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a "legal proxy" from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. You will need to contact your broker, bank or nominee to obtain a legal proxy, and you will need to bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote in person.

Q.    How does the board of directors recommend that I vote?

A.
Our board of directors recommends that you vote:

(1)
"FOR" the election of the Company's nominees to the board of directors.

(2)
"FOR" ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2013.

(3)
"FOR" the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and the related footnotes and narrative accompanying the tables).

Table of Contents

Q.    What is the voting requirement to approve each of the items?

A. Item One—Election of directors The persons receiving the highest number of "FOR" votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this election.

 

 

Item Two—Ratification of appointment of independent public accounting firm

 

To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the "FOR" vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

 

 

Item Three—Advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers

 

To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the "FOR" vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.



Item Four—Advisory vote determining the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of named executive officers


The frequency option (one, two or three years) receiving a majority of the votes cast will be the option selected by the stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votesif any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. The results of the votes on this Item Three and Item Four are not binding on the board of directors, whether or not anythe resolution is passed under thethese voting standards described above. In calculating the stockholder votes on these advisory resolutions, the board will consider the voting results in their entirety.standards.

Q.    How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Stockholders of Record.    If your shares are registered directly in your name with the American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, our "transfer agent," you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and the proxy materials, including the proxy card, are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the enclosed proxy card or vote using the ballot provided at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you decide later not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Table of Contents

Q.    How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

A.
Whether you hold shares in your name or through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote without attending the Annual Meeting. You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, by submitting voting instructions to that nominee. For shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, follow the instructions on the voting instruction card included with your voting materials. If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as you have instructed and as the proxy holders may determine within their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting.

Q.    What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Other than the fourthree items of business described in this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Q.    What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

A.
If you hold shares in your name,are a stockholder of record, and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, the proxy holdersproxyholders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our board of directors on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and, with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, as the proxy holdersproxyholders may determine in their discretion.

Table of Contents

Q.    What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

A.
A majority of the Company's outstanding shares as of the Record Date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a quorum, whether representing votes for, against, withheld or abstained, if you:

are present and vote at the Annual Meeting; or

properly submit a proxy card or vote over the internetInternet or by telephone.

Q.    How can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?

A.
If you are a stockholder of record, there are three ways you can change your vote or revoke your proxy after you have sent in your proxy form.

First, you may send a written notice to Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119, stating that you would like to revoke your proxy.

Second, you may complete and submit a newanother valid proxy form.by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and if mailed, is properly signed, or if submitted by telephone or over the Internet is received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 15, 2013. Any earlier proxies will be revoked automatically.

Third, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Any earlier proxy will be revoked. However, attending the Annual Meeting without voting in person will not revoke your proxy.

Q.    Who will tabulate the votes?

A.
The board of directors has appointed Kenneth E. Dornblaser, Senior Vice Presidentour transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and General Counsel ofTrust Company ("AST"), to tabulate and certify the Company,vote, and W. Mark Womble, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,AST will have a representative to act as inspectorsthe independent inspector of the election atelections for the Annual Meeting. As inspectors, Messrs. Dornblaser and WombleAST will be responsible for (i) determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, (ii) receiving all votes and ballots, whether by proxy or in person, with regard to all issues voted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iii) counting and tabulating all such votes and ballots and (iv) determining and reporting the results with regard to all such issues voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Q.    Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A.
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish preliminary results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")SEC within four business days offollowing the Annual Meeting.

Q.    How can I obtain a separate set of proxy materials?

A.
To reduceWe have adopted a procedure approved by the expenseSEC known as "householding." Under this procedure, multiple stockholders residing at the same address have the convenience of delivering duplicate proxy materials to our stockholders who may have more than one common stock account, we are delivering only one set of the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement to certain stockholders who share an address, unless otherwise requested. A separate proxy card is included in the proxy materials for each of these stockholders. If you share an address with another stockholder and have received only one set of proxy materials, you mayreceiving a

Table of Contents

Q.    Who pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

A.
We will pay the costs of the solicitation of proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons for expenses incurred in forwarding the voting materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our board members, officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone.

Q.    Can I Stockholders voting over the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statementusage charges from telephone companies and Annual Report onInternet access providers, that must be borne by the internet?

A.
As permitted under the rules of the SEC, the Company is making the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and its Annual Report available to its stockholders electronically via the internet athttp://www.amstock.com/ProxyServices/ViewMaterial.asp?CoNumber=17377. The Company is sending, on or about April 10, 2012, a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 23, 2012, which Notice will include (i) instructions on how to access the Company's proxy materials electronically, (ii) the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting, (iii) a description of the matters intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iv) a list of the materials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on how a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the Company's proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the proxy card, and (vii) information about attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.stockholder.

Q.    Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A.
The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the Annual Meeting and for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central Time for any purpose relevant to the Annual Meeting. To arrange to view this list during the times specified above, please contact the Secretary of the Company at Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.

Q.    What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year's annual meeting?

A.
Shareholders who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the "Exchange Act," wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with the 20132014 annual meeting of stockholders, must submit their proposals so that they are received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 11, 2012,3, 2013, or, in the event the Company's 20132014 annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail the proxy materials for the 20132014 annual meeting. As the SEC rules make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the Company's proxy materials.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents

Q.    How do I nominate a candidate for election as a director?

A.
Stockholders who wish to nominate a candidate for election as a director at our 20132014 annual meeting must submit their nomination in writing to the Company's Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 25, 201317, 2014 and no later than February 24, 2013,16, 2014, or, in the event the Company's 20132014 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 20132014 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2014 annual meeting is first made by the Company.

Q.    How can I communicate with the board of directors?

A.
Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the board of directors, or the Company's non-management directors as a group, by writing to Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. Comments or complaints relating to the Company's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the board of directors.

THIS QUESTION AND ANSWER SECTION IS ONLY MEANT TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE
PROXY STATEMENT. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE REFER TO THE MATERIAL
CONTAINED IN THE SUBSEQUENT PAGES.


Table of Contents


NOTE REGARDING OUR CORPORATE REORGANIZATION

        On December 19, 2011, pursuant to the terms of a corporate reorganization completed prior to the closing of the Company's initial public offering, the Company merged with Laredo Petroleum, LLC ("Laredo LLC"), with the Company being the surviving entity. All of Laredo LLC's outstanding preferred equity units were exchanged for shares of the Company's common stock in accordance with the limited liability company agreement of Laredo LLC ("LLC Agreement"). In addition, under the LLC Agreement and the restricted unit agreements, certain series of Laredo LLC's incentive equity units were exchanged into the Company's common stock. To the extent any of such incentive units were subject to vesting requirements, the common stock issued in exchange therefor is also subject to such requirements.

        The number of shares of common stock that the former holders of Laredo LLC units received in the reorganization was determined by the value such holder would have received under the distribution provisions in the LLC Agreement upon a liquidation of Laredo LLC at a liquidation value determined by reference to the initial offering price. The Company issued an aggregate of approximately 107,500,000 shares of common stock to the former unitholders of Laredo LLC in exchange for an aggregate of 215,236,554 equity units in Laredo LLC.

        We refer to (i) the merger of the Company and Laredo LLC, (ii) the exchange of all of the outstanding preferred equity units and certain series of incentive equity units of Laredo LLC for shares of the Company's common stock in accordance with the LLC Agreement and (iii) the consummation of the other related transactions collectively as our "corporate reorganization."

        As used in this Proxy Statement, the term "Laredo" refers to the Company and its subsidiaries for periods after the corporate reorganization and to Laredo LLC and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the corporate reorganization.


Table of Contents


ITEM ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        On the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the board of directors has nominated the following individuals for election as directors of the Company to serve for a one yearone-year term to expire in 20132014 and until either they are re-elected or their successors are elected and qualified:

Randy A. Foutch
Jerry R. Schuyler
Peter R. Kagan
James R. Levy
B.Z. (Bill) Parker
Pamela S. Pierce
Ambassador Francis Rooney
Dr. Myles W. Scoggins
Edmund P. Segner, III
Donald D. Wolf

        All of the individuals listed above with the exception of Dr. Scoggins, are currently serving as directors of the Company. The board of directors voted to increase the size of the board of directors in accordance with the Company's bylaws and on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which, after review and discussion, determined that it is in the best interest of the Company to increase the size of the board of directors to increase the diversity of viewpoints and expertise of the members of the board of directors. The board of directors, after review and discussion, has further concluded that Dr. Scoggins is qualified to serve as a director as he has nearly 40 years of experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry with extensive industry and management experience and expertise, and has served in various senior executive and management positions in the upstream oil and gas business. The biographical information for all director nominees is contained in the "Directors" section below.

        Each of the ten10 director nominees receiving a plurality of the votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected. The board of directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the election of each of the nominees listed above.

        Unless otherwise instructed, the proxyholders will vote the proxies received by them for the ten10 nominees named above. The board of directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company's directors will be reduced or the proxyholders will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the board of directors recommends.

        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES.


Table of Contents


DIRECTORS

        After the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the nominees of the board of directors as set forth in "Item One—Election of Directors" above, the board of directors of the Company will be:

Directors
Name
 Age Position

Randy A. Foutch

  6061 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Jerry R. Schuyler

  5657 Director, President and Chief Operating Officer

Peter R. Kagan(1)Kagan(1)

  4344 Director

James R. Levy(2)Levy

  3637 Director

B.Z. (Bill) Parker(2)Parker(2)(3)

  6465 Director

Pamela S. Pierce(1)Pierce(1)(3)

57Director

Ambassador Francis Rooney(1)(3)

  58 Director

Dr. Myles W. ScogginsAmbassador Francis Rooney(1)(3)

  6459Director

Dr. Myles W. Scoggins(2)(3)

65 Director

Edmund P. Segner, III(2)III(2)(3)

  5859 Director

Donald D. Wolf(1)Wolf(1)(2)(3)

  6869 Director

(1)
Member of the Compensation Committee.Committee

(2)
Member of the Audit Committee.Committee

(3)
Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Committee

        Our board of directors currently consists of nine members, and following the election of directors at the Annual Meeting will consist of ten10 members, each serving for one yearone-year terms. Each year the directors stand for re-election, as their terms of office expire on the date of the annual meeting of the stockholders.

        Set forth below is biographical information about each of our directors and nominees for director.as of March 31, 2013.

        Randy A. Foutch is Laredo's founder and has served as Laredo's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since that time. He also served as Laredo's President from October 2006 to July 2008. Mr. Foutch has over 30 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Prior to our formation, Mr. Foutch founded Latigo Petroleum, Inc. ("Latigo") in 2001 and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer until it was sold to Pogo Producing Co. in May 2006. Previous to Latigo, Mr. Foutch founded Lariat Petroleum, Inc. ("Lariat") in 1996 and served as its President until January 2001 when it was sold to Newfield Exploration, Inc. He is currently serving on the board of directors of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and is also a member of its audit and nominating and corporate governance committees. Mr. Foutch is also a member of the National Petroleum Council, America's Natural Gas Alliance and the Advisory Council of the Energy Institute at the University of Texas, Austin. From 2006 to August 2011, he served on the board of directors of Bill Barrett Corporation and from 2006 to 2008, on the board of directors of MacroSolve, Inc. Mr. Foutch also serves on the University of Tulsa Board of Trustees and several nonprofit and private industry boards. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Geology from the University of Texas and a Master of Science in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Houston.

        Mr. Foutch has been successful in founding other oil and gas companies and serves in director positions of various oil and gas companies. As a result, he provides a strong operational and strategic background and has valuable business, leadership and management experience and insights into many aspects of the operations of exploration and production companies. Mr. Foutch also brings financial expertise to the board, including his experience in obtaining financing for startup oil and gas companies. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Foutch is qualified to serve as a director.


Table of Contents

        Jerry R. Schuyler joined Laredo in June 2007 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. In July 2008, he was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer and has served in that capacity since that time. He is also one of our directors. Prior to joining Laredo, he held various executive positions with Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO"), Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. and St. Mary Land & Exploration. While at St. Mary Land & Exploration from December 2003 to June 2007, he established their Houston and Midland offices and managed all exploration and production activities in the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf Coast and Permian areas. While at Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. from March 2000 to July 2002, he managed all exploration and production activities in the Gulf Coast, Michigan and Appalachian areas. During his years with ARCO from 1977 to 1999, he held several key positions, such as Prudhoe Bay Field Manager, Manager of Worldwide Exploration and Production Planning and President of ARCO Middle East and Central Asia. Mr. Schuyler serves on several industry and college related boards of directors. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Montana Tech University and attended numerous graduate business courses at the University of Houston.

        Mr. Schuyler has significant experience managing oil and gas operations and serving in executive positions for various exploration and production companies and extensive knowledge of the energy industry. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Schuyler is qualified to serve as a director.

        Peter R. Kagan has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since July 2007. He has been with Warburg Pincus LLC ("Warburg Pincus") since 1997 where he leads the firm's investment activities in energy and natural resources. He is a Partner of Warburg Pincus & Co. and a Managing Director of Warburg Pincus. He is also a member of Warburg Pincus' Executive Management Group. Mr. Kagan is currently on the board of directors of Antero Resources, China CBM Investment Holdings,Asian American Gas Ltd., Fairfield Energy, Hawkwood Energy LLC, MEG Energy, Canbriam Energy Inc., Targa Resources Inc. and Targa Resources Partners L.P. He previously served on the board of directors of Broad Oak Energy Inc. ("Broad Oak"), Lariat and Latigo. Mr. Kagan received a Bachelor of Arts degree cum laude from Harvard College and Juris Doctorate and Master of Business Administration degrees with honors from the University of Chicago.

        Mr. Kagan has significant experience with energy companies and investments and broad familiarity with the industry and related transactions and capital markets activity, which enhance his contributions to the board of directors. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Kagan is qualified to serve as a director.

        James R. Levy has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since May 2007. He joined Warburg Pincus in 2006 and focuses on investments in the energy industry. He is a Partner of Warburg Pincus & Co. and a Managing Director of Warburg Pincus. Prior to joining Warburg Pincus, he worked as an Associate at Kohlberg & Company, a middle market private equity investment firm, from 2002 to 2006, and as an Analyst and Associate at Wasserstein Perella & Co. from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Levy currently serves on the board of directors of EnStorage, Inc., a privately held energy storage system development company,Hawkwood Energy LLC, Suniva, Inc., a private company that manufactures solar cells for use in power generation, and Black Swan Energy Ltd, a privately held oil and gas exploration and production company.Ltd. He is a former director of Broad Oak. Mr. Levy received a Bachelor of Arts in history from Yale University.

        Mr. Levy has significant experience with investments in the energy industry and currently serves on the boards of various energy companies. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Levy is qualified to serve as a director.

        B. Z. (Bill) Parker has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since May 2007. Mr. Parker joined Phillips Petroleum Company in 1970 where he held various engineering positions in exploration and production in the United States and abroad. He later served in numerous executive positions at Phillips Petroleum Company and in 2000, he was named Executive Vice President for Worldwide Production & Operations. He retired from Phillips Petroleum Company in this position in November 2002. Mr. Parker served on the board of Williams


Table of Contents

Partners GP from August 2005 to September 2010 where he also served as chairman of the conflicts


Table of Contents

and audit committees. He served on the board of directors of Latigo from January 2003 to May 2006 where he also served as chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Parker is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Oklahoma.

        Mr. Parker has over 4041 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, having served in various engineering and executive positions for an exploration and production company and as a director and audit committee member for various energy companies. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Parker is qualified to serve as a director.

        Pamela S. Pierce has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since May 2007. She has been a partner at Ztown Investments, Inc. since 2005, focused on investments in domestic oil and natural gas non-working interests. She also serves onas Vice Chair of the Michael Baker, Inc. board of directors and is a member of the Scientific Drilling International, Inc. board of directors. From 2002 to 2004, she was the President of Huber Energy, an operating company of J.M. Huber Corporation. From 2000 to 2002, she was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Houston-based Mirant Americas Energy Capital and Production Company. She has also held a variety of managerial positions with ARCO Oil and Gas Company, ARCO Alaska and Vastar Resources. She received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and a Master of Business Administration in Corporate Finance from the University of Dallas.

        Ms. Pierce is a highly experienced business executive with extensive knowledge of the energy industry. Her business acumen enhances the board of directors' discussions on all issues affecting us and her leadership insights contribute significantly to the board of directors' decision making process. For these reasons, we believe Ms. Pierce is qualified to serve as a director.

        Ambassador Francis Rooney has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since February 2010. He has been the Chief Executive Officer of Rooney Holdings, Inc. since 1984, and of Manhattan Construction Group, Tulsa, since 2008, which is engaged in road and bridge construction, civil works and building construction and construction management in the United States, Mexico and the Central America/Caribbean region. From 2005 through 2008, he served as the United States Ambassador to the Holy See, appointed by President George W. Bush. Ambassador Rooney currently serves on the boards of directors of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and VETRA Energy Group, Bogota, Colombia. He is a member of the Board of Advisors of the Panama Canal Authority, Republic of Panama, the Board of the Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation the INCAE Presidential Advisory Council and the Board of Visitors of the University of Oklahoma International Programs. Ambassador Rooney graduated from Georgetown University with a Bachelor of Arts and from Georgetown University Law Center with a Juris Doctorate. He is a member of the District of Columbia and Texas Bar Associations.

        Ambassador Rooney has broad business and financial experience and has served as a director of public and private energy companies. For these reasons, we believe Ambassador Rooney is qualified to serve as a director.

        Dr. Myles W. Scoggins is a director nominee for the Company.has served as one of our directors since May 2012. In June 2006, Dr. Scoggins was appointed President of the Colorado School of Mines, an engineering and science research university with strong ties to the oil and gas industry. Dr. Scoggins retired in April 2004 after a 34-year career with Mobil Corporation and Exxon MobilExxonMobil Corporation, where he held senior executive positions in the upstream oil and gas business. From December 1999 to April 2004, he served as Executive Vice President of Exxon MobilExxonMobil Production Co. Prior to the merger of Mobil and Exxon in December 1999, he was President, International Exploration & Production and Global Exploration and an officer and member of the executive committee of Mobil Oil Corporation. He has been a member of the board of directors of Venoco, Inc., an oil and gas production company, since June 2007, Cobalt International


Table of Contents

Energy, an independent oil exploration and production company focusing on the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico and offshore Angola and Gabon


Table of Contents

in West Africa, since March 2010, QEP Resources, Inc., an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company with operations focused in the Rocky Mountain and Midcontinent regions of the United States, since July 2010 and currently serves as a member of the National Advisory Council of the United States Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory. From February 2005 until June 2010, Dr. Scoggins was a member of the board of directors of Questar Corporation, a Rockies-based integrated natural gas company, and from March 2005 until August 2011, he was a member of the board of directors of Trico Marine Services, Inc., an integrated provider of subsea, trenching and marine support vessels and services.services, and from June 2007 until October 2012, he was a member of the board of directors of Venoco, Inc., an oil and gas production company. Dr. Scoggins has a Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering from The University of Tulsa.

        Dr. Scoggins has nearly 4041 years of experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry with extensive industry and management experience and expertise, and has served in various senior executive and management positions in the upstream oil and gas business. For these reasons, we believe Dr. Scoggins is qualified to serve as a director.

        Edmund P. Segner, III joined our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) board of directors in August 2011. Mr. Segner currently is a professor in the practice of engineering management in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rice University in Houston, Texas, a position he has held since July 2006 and full time since July 2007. In 2008, Mr. Segner retired from EOG Resources, Inc. ("EOG"), a publicly traded independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Among the positions he held at EOG were President, Chief of Staff, and director from 1999 to 2007. From March 2003 through June 2007, he also served as the Principal Financial Officer of EOG. He has been a member of the board of directors of Bill Barrett Corporation, an oil and gas company primarily active in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States, since August 2009, and of Exterran Partners, L.P., a master limited partnership that provides natural gas contract operations services, since May 2009. From August 2009 until October 2011, Mr. Segner was a member of the board of directors of Seahawk Drilling, Inc., an offshore oil and natural gas drilling company. He also currently serves as a member of the board or as a trustee for several non-profit organizations. Mr. Segner graduated from Rice University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and received an M.A. degree in economics from the University of Houston. He is a certified public accountant.

        Mr. Segner's service as President, Principal Financial Officer and director of publicly traded oil and gas exploration and development companies provides our board of directors with a strong operational, financial, accounting and strategic background and provides valuable business, leadership and management experience and insights into many aspects of the operations of exploration and production companies. Mr. Segner also brings financial and accounting expertise to the board of directors, including through his experience in financing transactions for oil and gas companies, his background as a certified public accountant, his service as a Principal Financial Officer, his supervision of principal financial officers and principal accounting officers, and his service on the audit committees of other companies. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Segner is qualified to serve as a director.


Table of Contents

        Donald D. Wolf has served as one of our (and prior to our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) directors since February 2010. Mr. Wolf currently serves as the Chairman of the general partner of QR Energy, LP., which is a master limited partnership operated by Quantum Resources Management. He was the Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Resources Management from 2006 to 2009. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Aspect Energy, LLC from 2004 to 2006. Prior to joining Aspect, Mr. Wolf served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Westport Resources Corporation from 1996 to 2004. He is currently a director of the general partner of MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P., Enduring Resources, LLC Ute Energy, LLC, and Aspect Energy, LLC. Mr. Wolf graduated from Greenville College, Greenville, Illinois, with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.


Table of Contents

        Mr. Wolf has had a diversified career in the oil and natural gas industry and has served in executive positions for various exploration and production companies. His extensive experience in the energy industry brings substantial experience and leadership skill to the board of directors. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Wolf is qualified to serve as a director.


Table of Contents


MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

        Our board of directors held four10 meetings in 2011. Additionally, prior to the completion of2012, and our initial public offering, the board of managers of Laredo LLC held 14 meetings during 2011 and its independent directors met in executive session four times during 2011.2012. During 2011,2012, all of our directors attended each of Laredo's directors attended over 75% of the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of the board of directors, (and prior toindependent executive sessions and committees (including our corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC'sAnnual Meeting of Stockholders). In addition, each of our directors attended more than 75% of all meetings of the board of managers),directors, independent executive sessions and committee meetings, as applicable, that each such director was required to attend.attend, with the exceptions that Messrs. Rooney and Kagan attended 70% of such meetings. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the board of directors hold at least four meetings during 2012,2013, and that our independent directors meet in executive session regularly in 2012.2013. For more information regarding the role and structure of our board of directors refer to the "Corporate Governance" section included herein.

        The board of directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

        Audit Committee.    Information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee and its membership is set forth in the "Audit Committee Report" included herein and also in the "Audit Committee Charter" that is posted on the Company's website atwww.laredopetro.com. www.laredopetro.com. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. ParkerSegner (Chairman), Segner,Parker, Wolf and Dr. Scoggins. Until November 28, 2012, Mr. Levy and Wolf. Information regarding Mr. Levy's relationship with certain related partieswas also a member of the Company is set forthAudit Committee, but prior to the end of the one-year transition period allowed by Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, Mr. Levy was replaced on the Audit Committee by Dr. Scoggins at the November 2012 meeting of the board of directors. At the same time, Mr. Segner was elected Chairman of the Audit Committee, replacing Mr. Parker in the "Transactions with Related Persons—Acquisition of Broad Oak Energy, Inc." section included herein. Laredo'sthat capacity. The Audit Committee held ten11 meetings during 2011.2012. The Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least four times during 2012.2013.

        Compensation Committee.    Responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in the "Compensation Committee Charter" that is posted on the Company's website atwww.laredopetro.com,, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:

in consultation with senior management, establish the Company's general compensation philosophy and objectives;

review and approve the Company's goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, annually evaluate the Chief Executive Officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives and based on this evaluation determine the Chief Executive Officer's compensation level, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation;

make recommendations to the board of directors with respect to compensation for non-Chief Executive Officer executive officers;

make recommendations to the board of directors with respect to all employment agreements, severance arrangements, change in control provisions and agreements and any special supplemental benefits applicable to the Company's executive officers;

review and make recommendations to the board of directors with respect to incentive compensation and equity-based plans;

administer the Company's equity-based compensation plans, including the grant of stock options and other equity awards under such plans; and

review and make recommendations to the board of directors with respect to director compensation.


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee has the authority, to the extent it deems appropriate, to retain one or more compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of director, Chief Executive Officer or other executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any such consulting firm, and to approve the firm's fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee also has the authority, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, to retain other advisors. The Company will provide for appropriate funding as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of compensation to any consulting firm or other advisors employed by the Compensation Committee.

        The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Wolf (Chairman), Rooney and Kagan and Ms. Pierce. Information regarding Mr. Kagan's relationship with certain related parties of the Company is set forth in the "Transactions with Related Persons—Gas Gathering and Processing Arrangement with Targa" and "—Acquisition of Broad Oak Energy, Inc." sectionssection included herein.

        Laredo'sThe Compensation Committee held seveneight meetings in 2011.2012. The Compensation Committee Charter requires that the Compensation Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least once during 2012.2013.

        Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends qualified nominees to serve on the Company's board of directors, develops and oversees the Company's internal corporate governance processes and maintains a management succession plan. Additional information regarding the functions performed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is set forth in the "Corporate Governance" section included herein and also in the "Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter" that is posted on the Company's website atwww.laredopetro.com. www.laredopetro.com.

        The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Rooney (Chairman), Parker, Segner, Wolf and WolfDr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was formedheld five meetings in connection with the Company's initial public offering of its common stock in December 2011, and held one meeting in 2011.2012. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter requires that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least once during 2012.2013.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        Set forth below is biographical information about each of our executive officers.officers as of March 31, 2013.

        Randy A. Foutch is the Chairman of the board of directors of the Company and Laredo's Chief Executive Officer. Please see the "Directors" section above for Mr. Foutch's biographical information.

        Jerry R. Schuyler is a director of the Company and Laredo's President and Chief Operating Officer. Please see the "Directors" section above for Mr. Schuyler's biographical information.

        W. Mark Womble,Richard C. Buterbaugh, age 61, has served58, joined the Company in June 2012 as Laredo'sSenior Vice President—Investor Relations. Following the resignation of W. Mark Womble as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, and SeniorMr. Buterbaugh assumed the title of Executive Vice President since July 2007. Prior& Chief Financial Officer in December 2012. From March 2007 to June 2011, he was Vice President—Investor Relations and Corporate Planning at Quicksilver Resources Inc. From November 1989 to August 2006, he was with Kerr-McGee Corp., most recently as Vice President of Corporate Planning and previously as Vice President of Investor Relations and Communications. After leaving Quicksilver Resources, Inc. and prior to joining Laredo, as well as after leaving Kerr-McGee Corp. and prior to joining Quicksilver Resources, Inc., he was the Vice Presidenta consultant for oil and Chief Financial Officergas finance and management projects. Mr. Buterbaugh has 36 years of Latigocorporate finance, planning and served in this capacity from 2002 until the company was sold in May 2006. He then retired until joining Laredo in July 2007. Mr. Womble has more than 30 years ofinvestor relations experience in the oil and natural gas industry and, throughout his career, has served as financial analyst, consultant and in several executive positions with multiple companies.industry. He earnedholds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree and a Master of Business AdministrationScience degree in finance and accountingAccounting from West Texas Statethe University in Canyon, Texas.of Colorado.


Table of Contents

        Patrick J. Curth, age 60,61, has served as Laredo's Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land since October 2006. He has been involved in exploration and development projects in the Mid-Continent area for over three decades. Prior to joining Laredo, Mr. Curth joined Latigo in 2000 as Exploration Manager and served as Vice President—Exploration when Latigo was sold in May 2006. From 1997 to 2001, he was the Vice President—Exploration at Lariat. Mr. Curth holds a Bachelor of Arts in Geology from Windham College, a Masters Degree in Geological Sciences from the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee and a second Masters Degree in Environmental Sciences from Oklahoma State University.

        John E. Minton, age 63,64, joined Laredo in October 2007 as Vice President—Reservoir Engineering and became Senior Vice President—Reservoir Engineering in September 2009. Before joining Laredo, Mr. Minton served as Senior Vice President of Reservoir Engineering at Rockford II Energy Partners from July 2006 to October 2007. In 2003, he joined Latigo as a Senior Reservoir Engineer and later became Manager of Corporate Reservoir Engineering. He served in this position until the company was sold in May 2006. He joined Lariat in 2000 as a Senior Reservoir Engineer and stayed with its successor Newfield Exploration until early 2003 as a Senior Reservoir Engineer. Mr. Minton is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and has been a Registered Professional Engineer in the state of Oklahoma since 1982. He graduated from the University of Oklahoma with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering.

        Rodney S. Myers, age 58, joined Laredo in November 2010 as Senior Vice President—Special Projects, and in September 2011 he assumed the newly created position of Senior Vice President—Permian. Immediately prior to joining Laredo, Mr. Myers came out of retirement in November 2009 to manage Sheridan Production Company's Mid-Continent District office in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Previously, from December 2002 until his retirement in May 2006, he served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Latigo. Prior to Latigo, Mr. Myers spent over 13 years with Apache Corporation where he was Vice President for the Mid-Continent Region and Vice President of Production for its Central Region. Mr. Myers earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Missouri at Rolla.

Kenneth E. Dornblaser, age 57,58, joined Laredo in June 2011 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Upon the resignation of W. Mark Womble in December 2012, Mr. Dornblaser was also appointed Corporate Secretary. Immediately prior to joining Laredo, Mr. Dornblaser was a shareholder in the Johnson & Jones law firm, which he co-founded in March 1994. Prior to co-founding Johnson & Jones, Mr. Dornblaser had been engaged in the private practice of law in Tulsa, Oklahoma, with the law firm of Gable & Gotwals since 1980. Mr. Dornblaser graduated from Oklahoma State University with a B.S.Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and the University of Oklahoma where he received his Juris Doctorate degree.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding our and our named executive officers' future performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management's expectations or estimates of results or other guidance.


Introduction

        The following compensation discussion and analysis describes the material elements of compensation for our named executive officers as determined by the Company's (and prior to the corporate reorganization, Laredo LLC's) Compensation Committee for 2011.2012. In particular, this "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" (1) provides an overview of Laredo's historical and proposed compensation policies and programs; (2) explains our compensation objectives, policies and practices with respect to our executive officers; and (3) identifies the elements of compensation for each of the


Table of Contents

individuals identified in the "Named executive officers"Executive Officers" table, who we refer to in this "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section as our "named executive officers."


Compensation highlights

        In connection with going public, the Company developed and maintains compensation arrangements intended to optimize returns to shareholders and include best practice features, such as:

Feature
Explanation

Implemented market-based compensation strategy and objectives

Formalized compensation strategy which identifies the Company's position for each pay element relative to the market

Established peer group of competitor companies

Following the Company's initial public offering, developed a group of public companies similar in industry, size and expertise against which to compare executive compensation

Benchmarked executive compensation levels against competitive market

Compared compensation levels and practices to peer group and made adjustments accordingly

Adopted balanced approach to long-term incentives that includes objective performance measures

Implemented plan that includes restricted stock, stock options and performance units

Continued practice of not providing employment agreements

Historically, Laredo has not had employment agreements with executives

Did not provide tax gross-ups

Adopted change-in-control severance plan that does not provide for excise tax gross-ups

Conducted compensation risk assessment

Did not identify any compensation programs that promote excessive risk taking by executives

Established equity ownership guidelines

Adopted market competitive holding requirements expressed as a percentage of base salary

Designed incentive plans to qualify for a deduction under 162(m)

Stock options and performance unit awards were designed with the intent of qualifying for deductibility under 162(m)

Deemphasized indirect compensation for executives

Limited perquisites, retirement benefits, health and welfare benefits

Hired independent compensation consultant

The Compensation Committee independently engaged an outside advisor to assist in designing new compensation programs


Table of Contents


Named executive officersExecutive Officers

        For the 20112012 fiscal year, our named executive officers were:

Name

Principal position
Randy A. Foutch

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Richard C. Buterbaugh

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as of December 18, 2012

W. Mark Womble

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer through December 18, 2012

Jerry R. Schuyler

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

Patrick J. Curth

 

Senior Vice President—ExplorationPresident-Exploration and Land

John E. Minton

 

Senior Vice President—ReservoirPresident-Reservoir Engineering

        Messrs. Foutch, Buterbaugh and Womble are named executive officers by reason of their positions as the principal executive and financial officers of the Company during the year (or, in the case of Mr. Womble and Mr. Buterbaugh, a portion thereof), and each of Messrs. Schuyler, Curth and Minton are named executive officers by reason of them being our three most highly compensated officers other than Messrs. Foutch, Buterbaugh and Womble. Each


2012 Company Highlights

        In 2012, we accomplished several goals as we grew reserves, production and operating cash flow. We continued to delineate and de-risk our core assets in the Permian Basin. Among our highlights in 2012 were the following:

For the second consecutive year, we recorded zero employee OSHA-recordable incidents, with more than 400,000 man-hours worked.

We increased annual production by approximately 30% to 30.9 thousand barrel of oil equivalent per day ("MBOE/D") and increased our oil component attributable to this production to 42% from 39%.

Our proved reserves increased by 21%.

Our total identified resource potential increased to approximately 775 MMBOE and as of December 31, 2012, we had de-risked approximately 142,000 net acres in the vertical Wolfberry, 70,000 net acres in the horizontal Cline and 60,000 acres in the horizontal Upper Wolfcamp.

We acquired an additional 50,000 acres in our Permian—China Grove area, prospective for the Cline shale.

We executed a long-term sales contract to move 10,000 barrels of oil per day of Permian crude to Gulf Coast markets commencing second quarter 2013 and a firm transportation contract to move an additional 10,000 barrels of oil per day of Permian crude to Gulf Coast commencing second quarter 2014.

We built the first of two Laredo-owned crude oil truck stations in our Permian Basin areas to reduce total transportation costs and crude oil inventory levels.

Our total revenue grew to approximately $588 million, and we increased adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) to more than $450 million, both records for the Company.

We successfully implemented a capital expenditure program in excess of $900 million and maintained liquidity of approximately $700 million to fund future development and growth.


Table of the namedContents

We completed the registered exchange of our $550 million 91/2% senior notes, issued our $500 million 73/8% senior notes in a private placement, and subsequently completed the registration and exchange of such notes.

We successfully transitioned into a public company following our initial public offering.


Summary of our Compensation Program

        Compensation of our executive officers is an employee of Laredo Petroleum, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiaryhas historically included the following key components:

Base salaries;

Annual cash bonus awards, based primarily on overall Company performance, with consideration also given to relative individual performance; and

Long-term equity-based incentive awards, based primarily on the relative contribution of various officer positions, with consideration given to relative individual performance and, with respect to performance units, consideration given to relative total stockholder return over a three-year period.

        The progress of the Company in 2012, including but not limited to the continued growth of production and an officerreserves, as well as the further delineation of both Laredo Petroleum, Inc.our overall resource potential (particularly in the Permian Basin), resulted in management's recommendation and the Company; however, eachCompensation Committee's determination to endorse the executive compensation framework and elements discussed in this "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section as being in the best interests of the named executive officers is compensated by Laredo Petroleum, Inc., not the Company.


Process for Determining Executive Compensation

Administration of our compensation programs

        Our executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation Committee. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to overseesupervise the administration of compensation programs for all our officers and employees and those of our subsidiaries, including Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Officer compensation is reviewed at least annually for possible adjustments by the Compensation Committee.


Compensation philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation program

        Since Laredo'sour inception, in 2006, Laredo has sought to growwe have grown by focusing on the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in the Permian and Mid-Continent regions of the United States. Laredo'sOur compensation philosophy has been primarily focused on recruiting and motivating individuals to help Laredous continue that growth. Laredo'sOur executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate Laredo's highly qualified and committed personnel by compensating them with both long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity, options and performance units, and short-term cash compensation comprising salary and the possibility of annual bonuses.

        Prior to our initial public offering, although we attempted to keep our executive officers' total cash compensation at levels that we believed to be generally competitive with comparable positions of similar responsibility within our industry, Laredo did not employ a particular baseline position versus the market or particularized survey data for comparison or compensation-setting purposes. Laredo periodically assessed the competitiveness of the compensation packages for its executive officers and made appropriate adjustments to its program when it deemed necessary.

        In order to facilitate an effective transition into the new requirements we faced following consummation of our initial public offering in 2011, we have undertaken various reporting company preparedness initiatives to ensure the competiveness of our executive compensation programs and further align the interests of our executive officers and other employees with the long-term objectives of the Company. In particular, we engaged a compensation consultant to review the compensation arrangements we provide to our executive officers, recommend prospective compensation changes and identify potential areas where our compensation programs could be more competitive as discussed under the heading "—Role of external advisors." Any adjustment to our executive officers' compensation requires the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and the approval of the board of directors.


Table of Contents


Implementing our objectives

        Executive compensation decisions have historically beenare made on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee with input from Randy A.Messrs. Foutch, our ChairmanSchuyler, Buterbaugh and Chief Executive Officer, Jerry R. Schuyler, our President and Chief Operating Officer, and W. Mark Womble,Kenneth E. Dornblaser, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer.Secretary. Although the Compensation Committee considers the input received from these executive officers, compensation decisions are ultimately recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the board of directors.

        From time to time, Messrs. Foutch, Schuyler, Buterbaugh and Womble obtainedDornblaser obtain and reviewedreview external market information (including that received from the Compensation Committee's independent compensation advisor, as more fully described below) to assess Laredo'sthe Company's ability to provide


Table of Contents

competitive compensation packages to itsour executive officers and recommendedrecommend an adjustment to the compensation levels, when necessary. In making executive compensation recommendations, Messrs. Foutch, Schuyler, Buterbaugh and Womble consideredDornblaser consider both the Company's and the executive officers' performance during the year and Laredo's performance during the year. Moreover, an executive officer's expanded role at Laredothe Company could also serve as a basis for adjustment. Specifically, Messrs. Foutch, Schuyler, Buterbaugh and Womble providedDornblaser provide recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation levels for Laredo'sour existing executive officers (including(excluding themselves) and itsour compensation program as a whole.

        While the Compensation Committee gavegives considerable weight to Messrs. Foutch, SchuylerFoutch's, Schuyler's, Buterbaugh's and Womble'sDornblaser's input on compensation matters, the board of directors, after considering the recommendations of the Compensation Committee, has the final decision-making authority on all officer compensation matters. No other executive officers have assumed a role in the evaluation, design or administration of our executive officer compensation program.


RoleCompensation Best Practices

        The Company maintains compensation arrangements intended to optimize returns to shareholders and include best practice features, such as:

Not providing excise tax gross-ups to executives

Designing incentive plans intended to qualify for deductions under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent applicable

Maintaining rigorous equity ownership guidelines for our executives

Not providing employment agreements to executives

Performing an annual compensation risk assessment

Prohibiting option repricing

Prohibiting directors and officers from pledging stock


Shareholder Say-on-Pay Results

        In addition to these practices, at our 2012 Annual Meeting, our executive compensation program received the support of external advisorsmore than 99% of shares voted at the meeting. The Compensation Committee has considered these results and viewed this outcome as evidence of stockholder support of its executive compensation decisions and policies. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee substantially maintained our executive compensation policies for 2012. The Compensation Committee will continue to review stockholder votes on our executive compensation and determine whether to make any changes to the program as a result of these votes.


Compensation Consultant and Conflict of Interest Analysis

        In July 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged Cogent Compensation Partners, Inc. ("Cogent") to serve as its independent compensation advisor. In July 2012, Cogent was acquired by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FWC") at which time the Compensation Committee confirmed the retention of FWC as its independent compensation advisor. FWC did not provide any other services to the Company that were not authorized by the Compensation Committee. In accordance with the requirements of Item 407(e)(3)(iv) of Regulation S-K, in 2012 the Compensation Committee considered the relationships that Cogent and FWC have had with the Company, the members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the policies that Cogent and FWC have in place to maintain their independence and objectivity, and determined that no conflicts of interest


Table of Contents

arose from the work performed by Cogent and FWC. It is anticipated that the relationship will continue during 2013. The Compensation Committee's objective when engaging Cogent and FWC was to assess Laredo'sour level of competitiveness for executive-level talent and provide recommendations for attracting, motivating and retaining key employees, in light of its transition into the new obligations the Company faces as a SEC registrant. As part of its engagement, Cogent:


Table of Contentsidentifying industry best practices.

        Cogent'sFWC's initial report was presented to Laredo LLC's board of managers as a whole in August 2011. The report, which has since been updated as of January 1, 2012, was utilized by the Compensation Committee when making its recommendations to Laredo LLC'sthe Company's board of managersdirectors for the compensation programs and adjustments to the current programs that were made in 2011,2012 and later, as described below.


Competitive Benchmarking

        Cogent was engagedAt the request of the Compensation Committee, FWC identified potential peer companies for use in part to assess thebenchmarking our compensation levels of Laredo's executive officers relative to the market and Laredo's peer group of companies, as set forth below. Cogentpolicies. FWC used the following parameters when constructing the peer group for its assessment: (1) resource-focused exploration and production companies that are publicly traded, (2) companies with a good performance track record, (3) companies with a strong management team with technical expertise, and (4) companies with revenue between $100 million and $1 billion.

        Using these parameters and collaborating with Messrs. Foutch, Schuyler and Womble and members of the Compensation Committee, Cogent developed and originally recommended a 17-company industry reference peer group (the "Cogent Peer Group"), which was recommendedapproved by the Compensation Committee and approved by Laredo LLC's board of managers. The Cogent Peer Grouppeer group included the following companies:

Berry Petroleum Company

 

Forest Oil Corporation

Bill Barrett Corporation

 

LINN Energy LLC

Brigham Exploration Company

Company*
 

Oasis Petroleum Inc.

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

 

Quicksilver Resources, Inc.

Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.

 

Range Resources Corporation

Comstock Resources, Inc.

 

Sandridge Energy, Inc.

Concho Resources Inc.

 

SM Energy Company

Continental Resources, Inc.

 

Swift Energy Company

EXCO Resources, Inc.

  


Market-based compensation strategy

        Due to


*
Following its acquisition by another company in December 2011, Brigham Exploration Company was deleted from the broad responsibilitieslist of our executive officers and our prior status as a privately held company, comparing survey data to the job descriptionspeer group of our executive officers is sometimes difficult, although, as discussed above, our compensation objective is designed to be competitive with executives in comparable positions of similar responsibility within our industry.

        Given Cogent's engagement and their analysis, described under the heading "—Introduction—Role of external advisors," compensation program changes were adopted by Laredo LLC's board of managers so as to target base salary and annual incentive compensation around the market median, and long-term incentive compensation with the opportunity to earn between the median and upper quartilecompanies, so that total direct compensation levels would be betweencurrently our peer group consists of the median andremaining 16 companies identified above. For 2012, the upper quartile amongCompensation Committee determined that there was no material change to our business that required any other change in the Cogent Peer Group. We believe that targeting this level of compensation helps us achieve our overall total rewards strategy and executive compensation objectives outlined above. The details of our ongoing compensation program, and adjustments thereto, are discussed more fully under "—Elements of Compensation."


above-referenced peer group.

Table of Contents


Elements of Compensation

        Compensation of our executive officers has historically included the following key components:

our initial public offering.


Base salariesPay Mix

        The following tables set forth (1) the approximate percentage of each named executive officer's total compensation that Laredo paid in the form of (i) base salary and cash bonus awards and (ii) equity awards during fiscal year 2012 as set forth in the "Summary compensation table" below and (2) the allocation of base salary, target annual cash bonus and target long-term incentive awards of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers for 2013 (assuming each such person receives their target percentage for STIP and LTIP awards). We view the various components of compensation as related but distinct and emphasize "performance" by tying significant portions of total compensation to short- and long-term financial and strategic goals, currently in the form of base salaries, annual cash bonus awards and long-term plan-based incentive awards. Our compensation philosophy is designed to align the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders. For more information regarding the restricted unit awards, see the "Grants of plan-based awards table for the year ended December 31, 2012." We also attempt to set each officer's base salary in line with comparable positions with our peers and to award an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of overall Company strategic goals and each individual's relative contribution to those goals.


2012 Pay Mix

Name
 Principal Position Year(1) Base Salary and
Cash Bonus as a
Percentage of Total
Compensation(2)
 Equity Awards as a
Percentage of Total
Compensation(2)
 
Randy A. Foutch Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  2012  33% 66%
Richard C. Buterbaugh(3) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  2012  27% 72%
W. Mark Womble Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  2012  40% 59%
Jerry R. Schuyler President and Chief Operating Officer  2012  43% 56%
Patrick J. Curth Sr. Vice President—Exploration & Land  2012  41% 57%
John E. Minton Sr. Vice President—Reservoir Engineering  2012  41% 57%

(1)
The remaining portions of the named executive officers' total compensation were attributable to all other compensation paid for 2012.

(2)
Includes a one-time special bonus paid in 2012 in connection with our initial public offering in December 2011.

(3)
Mr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012 and was awarded a signing bonus of $50,000.

Table of Contents


Chief Executive Officer—2013 Estimated Pay Mix

GRAPHIC


Other named executive officers combined—2013 Estimated Pay Mix

GRAPHIC


Base Salaries

Purpose:    Base salaries are designed to provide a fixed level of cash compensation for services rendered during the year.

Competitive Positioning:    For base salaries, we target approximately the market median, because we believe this market mid-point allows us to attract and retain qualified personnel. In 2012, the aggregate base salaries for our named executive officers was approximately 90% of the market median.

Process for Setting Base Salaries:    Base salaries are reviewed annually, at a minimum,least annually, but are not adjusted if the Compensation Committee believes that our executives are compensated at proper levels in light of either our internal performance or external market factors.


Table of Contents

        In addition to providing a base salary that we believe is competitive with other, similarly situated, independent oil and gas exploration and production companies,peers, we also consider internal pay equity factors to appropriately alignamong each of our named executive officer's salary levels relative to the salary levels of our other officers so that it accurately reflects the officer's relative skills, responsibilities, experience and contributions to the Company. To that end, annualAnnual salary adjustments are based on a subjective analysis of many individual factors, including the:including:

the responsibilities of the officer;

the scope, level of expertise and experience required for the officer's position;

the strategic impact of the officer's position;

the potential future contribution of the officer; and

the actual performance of the officer during the year.

        In addition to the individual factors listed above, we also take into consideration our overall business performance and implementation of company objectives.Company objectives, as well as industry trends. While these factors generally provide context for making salary decisions, base salary decisions do not depend directly on attainment of specific goals or performance levels and no specific weighting is given to one factor over another.

        In February
Base Salary for 2012 and 2013

        The following table identifies the base salaries of 2011, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary increase of 3% for Messrs. Foutch, Womble, Schuyler and Curth and a 4% base salary increase for Mr. Minton due to Laredo's performance during 2010 and in order to provide theour named executive officers with fixed compensation comparable to market levels for similarly situated executives in the industry.


Table of Contents

        Later in 2011, after a review of Laredo's current compensation practices and survey of the Cogent Peer Group, a number of changes to base salaryduring 2012, as well as annual and long-term incentive targets, that are intended to provide more typical public companythe base salary and incentive arrangements as compared to the Cogent Peer Group, were considered andsalaries adopted by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee recommended thatfor such persons in February 2013 for the following changes to base salaries be adopted:


Base salary
remainder of 2013:

Name
 Prior salary Proposed salary  2012 salary 2013 salary 

Randy A. Foutch

 $466,800 $600,000  $600,000 $737,000 

W. Mark Womble

 $275,000 $350,000 

Richard C. Buterbaugh(1)

 $275,000 $410,000 

W. Mark Womble(2)

 $350,000 $ 

Jerry R. Schuyler

 $315,000 $375,000  $375,000 $427,000 

Patrick J. Curth

 $275,000 $330,000  $330,000 $347,000 

John E. Minton

 $230,000 $260,000(1) $275,000 $290,000 

(1)
DueMr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012, with a base salary of $275,000 and subsequently promoted to aExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 18, 2012 with an increase in base salary increase recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by theto $410,000 at that time.

(2)
Mr. Womble resigned as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective December 18, 2012.

        The Company's board of directors in February of 2012, Mr. Minton's current salary is $275,000. The current salaries of Messrs. Foutch, Womble, Schuyler and Curth are as stated in the "Proposed salary" column.

        Based on these proposals, Laredo LLC's board of managers approved increases in the base salaries of Laredo's named executive officers for 2013 as shown in the table above,above. The salary increases were effective as of September 1, 2011.February 10, 2013. The rationale for increasing base salaries was to adjust base salaries to approximately the median of the Cogent Peer Group,our peer group, consistent with Laredo's compensation strategy. CogentFWC reported that prior to the adjustments, currentadjustment, base salaries of Laredo's named executive officers were approximately 82%90% of the market median. Other than with respect to Mr. Minton, baseButerbaugh was not given an additional salary adjustments have not been madeincrease in 2012 for our named executive officers due to the adjustments made2013 since he was promoted late in late 2011 prior to the Company's initial public offering.2012.


Table of Contents


Annual cash bonus awardsCash Bonus Awards

Purpose:    Annual cash bonus awards are a key part of each named executive officer's annual compensation package. The Compensation Committee believes that cash bonuses are an appropriate way to further the Company's goals of attracting, retaining and rewarding highly qualified and experienced officers. Cash bonuses are generally awarded annually following completion of the service year for which bonuses are payable and are based primarily on Laredo's performance for such service year, but consideration is also given to individual performance and specific contribution to Laredo's success and performance.

Competitive Positioning:    For annual cash bonus awards, the Company targets approximately the market median. In 2012, the Company was positioned at 81% of the market median. We believe targeting the market median allows us to attract and retain qualified personnel.

Plan mechanics:    For the 20112012 fiscal year, annual cash bonuses were determined in two parts at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee for ultimate approval by the board of directors. Consistent with the historical practices of Laredo, 50% of the cash bonus awardsaward for each named executive officer was determined by the 20112012 Bonus Performance Metric Results described below, while the remaining 50% was subjectively determined by the Compensation Committee whileconsidering the Company's overall performance in other areas. Individual adjustments were made after considering input provided by Mr.Messrs. Foutch and Schuyler regarding both Company performance in other areas as well as individual performance factors such as leadership, commitment, attitude, motivational effect, level of responsibility and overall contribution to Laredo's success (but excluding with respect to hisMr. Foutch's own performance, which was solely determined by the Compensation Committee). Although our cash bonus program includes the Company performance goals and objectives, our Compensation Committee has the ultimate discretion to recommend to the board of directors whether to award any, and the amount of, cash bonus awards, even if the Bonus Performance Metric Results do not satisfy the Bonus Performance Metric Targets.


Table of Contents

Performance Metrics and Results:    The 20112012 Bonus Performance Metric Results consisted of the following performance metric categories and targets for Laredothe Company (the targets reflected in Laredo's 20112012 internal budget), with the percentile as recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the board of directors:

Performance metric
 2011
targets
 2011
results(1)
 Relative
weighting
 

Drilling Capital Efficiency for Proved Developed Producing Reserves ($/MBoe)

 $18.22 $22.67  25%

Drilling Rate of Return (%)

  20% 23% 20%

Production (MBoe)

  6,766  6,962  15%

New Proved Developed Reserves (MBoe)

  26,598  20,391  15%

Direct Lifting Cost ($/Boe)

 $3.69 $4.06  10%

Finding Cost ($/Boe)

 $15.89 $21.58  5%

General and Administrative Expenses

 $5.37 $4.48  10%
Performance metric
 2012
targets
 2012
results
 Relative
weighting
 

Production (MBOE)

  11.5  11.3  15%

Lease Operating Expenses ($/BOE)(1)

 $5.14 $5.96  10%

Drilling Capital Efficiency ($/MBOE)

 $20.49 $23.56  25%

Drilling Rate of Return (%) at predrill commodity prices and actual costs

  20%  18%  20%

Finding Cost ($/BOE)(2)

 $20.59 $18.73  5%

New Reserves (MMBOE)(2)

  39.7  34.2  15%

General and Administrative Expenses(3)

 $4.91 $4.61  10%

(1)
Reflects the full year results for Laredo plus the results for Broad Oak starting July 1, 2011.Includes both lease operating expenses and workover expenses in a dollar per barrel of oil equivalent ("$/BOE") metric.

(2)
Based on internal reserve estimates.

(3)
Excludes non-cash stock-based compensation.

        The 50% non-metric subjective performance criteria is largely based on Laredo's overall accomplishments. For fiscal year 2011, the board of directors primarily looked to the following Laredo accomplishments in determining non-metric subjective performance:

        The historical cash bonus target for all named executive officers was 100% of their respective annual base salary. Based on Laredo's 2011 accomplishments and the 2011 performance results, and after discussion with Messrs. Foutch, Schuyler and Womble, the Compensation Committee independently recommended, and the board of directors approved, (i) a 120% weighting of the non-metric performance criteria and (ii) an average payout of 95% of the cash bonus target. For the specific bonus amounts paid to each named executive officer, see the "Summary compensation table" contained herein.

        For the 2011 fiscal year, the performance metric categories included all of the 2010 performance metric categories and added a General and Administrative Expenses performance metric category.        These particular metric categories were selected, in part, due to their prevalentour historical use in modeling byof similar metrics prior to our initial public offering for similar compensation purposes. We believe the larger investment community. The relative weighting of the performance metric categories are reallocated each year as recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the board of directors.metrics

        In addition to the changes in base salary described above, during 2011, Cogent also proposed setting annual incentive targets and long-term incentive targets as a percentage of base salary, and assumed (for purposes of the annual incentive plan) that the Company adopt a more traditional performance-based annual bonus plan. The chart below shows the new target award levels for each named executive officer under the annual and long-term incentive programs.

Name
 Annual incentive target Long-term incentive target

Randy A. Foutch

 100% of base salary 450% of base salary

W. Mark Womble

 80% 275%

Jerry R. Schuyler

 85% 275%

Patrick J. Curth

 70% 275%

John E. Minton

 60% 150%

Table of Contents

        Based on these proposals,captured several critical performance criteria to provide a quantitative measure of overall Company performance.

        Effective for 2013, following consultation between FWC and our Compensation Committee and the consideration and recommendation by the Compensation Committee recommended, and approval by the board of directors, approved, an annual bonus program that provides for 50% of a named executive officer's annual incentivewe have modified the performance metrics and weightings, primarily to more closely align the metrics with those metrics we believe to be non-formulaicprevalently used in modeling by the investment community, as well as by our peer group. The metric categories and relative weighting to be applied to our 2013 fiscal year performance are set forth below.

2013 Performance metric
Relative
weighting

Production (MBOE)

25%

Lease Operating & General and Administrative Expense ($/BOE)

25%

Drilling Capital Efficiency ($/MBOE)

20%

Drilling Rate of Return (%) at predrill commodity prices and actual costs

20%

All-in Finding and Development Cost ($/BOE)

10%

        In addition, based primarily on the recommendation of FWC following their analysis of our peer group metrics, the Compensation Committee's discretion, based onCommittee determined that effective for fiscal year 2013, 60% of the Company'scash bonus awards will be determined by the 2013 performance relative to such factors as, without limitation, Adjusted EBITDA and cash flow amounts, relative total shareholder return, individual performance and such other factors as maymetrics described above, while the remaining 40% will be subjectively determined by the Compensation Committee, to be appropriate, and 50% to be determined based upon pre-establishedconsidering the Company's overall performance criteria consisting of the following operational metrics: (i) drilling capital efficiency, (ii) drilling rate of return (on a well by well basis at pre-drill commodity prices and actual costs), (iii) production, (iv) new reserves, (v) direct lifting costs, (vi) finding costs (total exploration costs and development costs divided by the total proved reserves added during the year), and (vii) general and administrative expense.in other areas.

Target Award Levels:    Target incentive levels for 2011short-term incentive payouts for 2012 for each named executive officer are listed above.below. Award levels are calculated on a threshold level of 50% of target and a maximum of 200% of target. Threshold,The annual incentive target and maximum annual incentives have been set at the same level for ourpercentage varies by named executive officers forofficer and is based on differing job classifications and responsibilities. Each position is compared to similar positions in the market as well as our peer companies.

Name
Annual incentive target
(percentage of base salary)

Randy A. Foutch

100%

Richard C. Buterbaugh(1)

  80%

W. Mark Womble(2)

  80%

Jerry R. Schuyler

  85%

Patrick J. Curth

  75%

John E. Minton

  70%

(1)
Mr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012 fiscal year, except that Mr. Curth'sand his annual incentive target was set at 75%,70%. After Mr. Minton'sButerbaugh was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 18, 2012, his annual incentive target was set at 70% and Mr. Minton's long-term incentive target was increased to 200%.80% which is reflected in the table above.

(2)
Mr. Womble resigned as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective December 18, 2012.

Table of Contents


Long-term plan-basedShort-term incentive awardspayouts for 2012 performance

        Following the Compensation Committee's review of the 2012 Performance Metrics Results as well as the subjective results of the Company as described above, the Compensation Committee approved Mr. Foutch's recommendations for cash bonuses for his direct reports and the Compensation Committee also approved an award for Mr. Foutch. For fiscal year 2012, the board of directors primarily looked to the Company's accomplishments which are stated above under "2012 Company Highlights" in determining subjective performance criteria. Based on a combination of both the performance metrics results and the subjective results noted above, the Compensation Committee determined the Company's overall performance resulted in a 90% payout. This percentage was arrived at following the Compensation Committee's determination that the Company achieved roughly an 80% target level on its overall 2012 Bonus Performance Metric Results and a 100% level on the subjective criteria identified in part under "2012 Company Highlights." The Compensation Committee agreed to a pro-rated payout to Mr. Buterbaugh based on his hire date of June 1, 2012, and a reduction in the annual bonus for Mr. Womble based on his transition to retirement. The short-term incentive bonuses approved by the Compensation Committee to the named executive officers averaged 87% of the target bonus amounts aligning with the overall performance rating percentage, with the individual awards identified in the following table. The amounts shown under the "Recommended Award" column were paid to the named executive officers after our financial statements had been completed and our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed in March 2013.

Name
 2012 Salary Annual
Incentive
Percentage
at Target
 Short-Term
Incentive
Payout
at Target
 Recommended
Award
 Percent
Payout

Randy A. Foutch

 $600,000 100% $600,000 $540,000 90%

Richard C. Buterbaugh(1)

 $410,000 80% $328,000 $172,200 53%

W. Mark Womble(2)

 $350,000 80% $280,000 $192,000 69%

Jerry R. Schuyler

 $375,000 85% $318,750 $286,880 90%

Patrick J. Curth

 $330,000 75% $247,500 $222,750 90%

John E. Minton

 $275,000 70% $192,500 $173,250 90%

(1)
Mr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012, with a base salary of $275,000 and subsequently promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 18, 2012 with an increase in base salary to $410,000 at that time. Mr. Buterbaugh's STIP was pro-rated based on his June 1, 2012 start date.

(2)
Mr. Womble's award was reduced based on transition to retirement.

        In addition to base salary increases described previously, FWC also proposed increasing short-term incentive targets as a percentage of base pay for Mr. Foutch to 110% and Mr. Schuyler to 90% for the 2013 STIP. The decision was made after reviewing market median data for total cash compensation for executives in our peer group. The Compensation Committee and board of directors approved the recommendation.


Long-term Plan-Based Incentive Awards

        In connection with our initial public offering in late 2011, we adopted the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in 2011 (the "2011 Plan"). The purpose of the 2011 Plan is to provide a means for use to attract and retain key personnel and for our directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors to acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and aligning their interests with those of the Company's stockholders.


Table of Contents

Purpose:      Our historical long-term plan-based incentive program was designed to provide our employees, including our named executive officers, with an incentive to focus on our long-term success and to act as a long-term retention tool by aligning the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders.

Competitive Positioning:    For long-term plan-based incentive awards, the Company targets between the market median and market 75th percentile of comparable long-term incentive compensation. In 2012, the past, Laredo granted restricted units in Laredo LLC to Laredo's named executive officers were positioned at 78% of the market median and certain independent directors57% of the market 75th percentile.

Target Award Levels:    Target incentive levels for long-term incentive payouts for 2012 for each named executive officer are listed below and are calculated as a meanspercentage of providing thembase salary. The long-term incentive target percentage varies by named executive officer and is based on differing job classifications and responsibilities. Each position is compared to similar positions in the market as well as our peer companies.

Name
Long-Term
Incentive
Percentage
at Target

Randy A. Foutch

450%

Richard C. Buterbaugh(1)

300%

W. Mark Womble(2)

275%

Jerry R. Schuyler

275%

Patrick J. Curth

275%

John E. Minton

200%

(1)
Mr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012 and his annual incentive target with long-term equity275%. After Mr. Buterbaugh was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 18, 2012, his annual incentive compensation that may directly profit from any success Laredo achieves. In connection with our initial public offering andtarget increased to 300% which is reflected in the table above.

(2)
Mr. Womble resigned as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective December 18, 2012.

Long-Term Incentive Vehicles:    For corporate reorganization, these unvested restricted units were exchanged for shares of restricted common stock of the Company.

        In addition, in connection with our initial public offering in 2011, the Compensation Committee recommended and the board of directors adopted the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, or the "2011 Plan," which provides for performance awards, restricted stock, stock options and certain other equity-based compensation to eligible employees, directors and consultants. The 2011 Plan is further described below. Going forward, equity-based compensation will be awarded to our employees under the 2011 Plan.

        On February 3, 2012, the board of directors ofofficers the Company upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee, granted restricted shares of our common stock to all employees, options to purchase shares of our common stock (the "Stock Options") to our officers and certain management level employees, and performance units (the "Performance Units") to our officers under the 2011 Plan. Following the philosophy that all employees should have an equity interest in the Company, all employees were granted restricted shares of our common stock. Stock Options were granted only to employees in certain management positions or above and Performance Units were granted only to employees with officer positions and above. For officers receiving all three plan-based awards, the relativetargets a long-term incentive vehicle mix of such awards wasapproximately 25% restricted stock, 25% stock options, and 50% performance units. This mix of incentive vehicles, as well as the applicable vesting periods described below, were adopted by the board of directors following the recommendation of FWC and a review of comparable awards was intended to provide a typical public company incentive arrangement as compared togranted by our peer group and the Cogent Peer Group.industry in general.

Restricted Stock:    The restricted shares of our common stock are subject to forfeiture until vested. So long as the recipient of such shares is an employee of Laredo,the Company, the shares granted to each recipient will vest, and the transfer restrictions thereon will lapse pursuant to the following schedule: (i) 33% of the shares will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, (ii) an additional 33% of the shares will vest on the


Table of Contents

second anniversary of the grant date and (iii) the balance of the shares will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.ratably over three years. Each recipient will forfeit his or her unvested shares if the recipient's employment with Laredo is terminated by Laredous for any reason or if the recipient resigns (in either case, other than for death or disability). The Company believesWe believe that this vesting schedule is comparable to those utilized by the Cogent Peer Grouppeer group and will assist Laredous in attracting new talent and retaining existing personnel. Future grants of restrictedRestricted shares of common stock will be madegranted to new employees upon hire, based on their relative entry level into Laredo.the Company.

Stock Options:    Stock options provide the opportunity to purchase our stock at a price that is fixed on the grant date regardless of the future market price. If our stock price does not increase, then these stock options will have little to no economic value. Pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Plan, the


Table of Contents

exercise price for each stock option is the closing price of a share of stock on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") on the grant date.

        The Stock Options are subject to the following vesting schedule: 25% willstock options vest on the first anniversary of the date of the grant and incrementally 25% on each anniversary thereafter, so long as the optionee is an employee of Laredo.ratably over four years. As with the restricted shares of itsour common stock, the Company believeswe believe that this vesting schedule is comparable to those utilized by the Cogent Peer Groupour peer group and will allow itus to both attract new talent and retain existing personnel. The unvested portion of a Stock Optionstock option will expire upon termination of employment of the optionee, and the vested portion of a Stock Optionstock option will remain exercisable for (i) one year following termination of employment by reason of the optionee's death or disability or (ii) 90 days for any other reason, other than for cause. Both the unvested and vested (but unexercised) portion of a Stock Optionstock option will expire upon the termination of the optionee's employment by Laredous for cause. Unless sooner terminated, the Stock Optionstock option will expire if and to the extent it is not exercised within ten10 years from the date of the grant. Generally, grants of stock options will be made in the first quarter of each year.

Performance Units:    The Performance Unitsperformance units granted to each recipient are payable in cash based upon the achievement by the Company over a three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2012 and ending on December 31, 2014 ofagainst performance goals established by the Compensation Committee.

        Each performance unit will have a grant date value of $100. The amount of cash payable at the end of the performance period will be determined by multiplying the number of Performance Units granted by $100 and multiplying that productperformance units by the total shareholder return modifier ("TSR Modifier"), which is the percentage, if any, achieved by attainment of the following performance goals for the performance period, as certified by the administrator: (i) if the Company's total shareholder return ("TSR") measured against the Company's peer group is below the 40th percentile, the. The TSR Modifier is 0%, (ii) if the TSR measured against the Company's peer group is in the 40th percentile, the TSR Modifier is 50%, (iii) if the TSR measured against the Company's peer group is in the 60th percentile, the TSR Modifier is 100% and (iv) if the TSR measured against the Company's peer group is in the 80th percentile, the TSR Modifier is 200%, with 200% being the maximum and the Compensation Committee interpolating all pointsdetermined as follows:

Level of Performance
TSR
Modifier(1)

Below Threshold (Below 40th Percentile)

0%

Threshold (40th Percentile)

50%

Target (60th Percentile)

100%

Maximum (80th Percentile)

200%

(1)
Amounts between the threshold and the maximum. TSRpercentages are interpolated on a straight line basis.

        Total shareholder return for the Company and each of the peer companies is determined by dividing (i) the end average stock price plus dividends minus the start average stock price by (ii) the start average stock price, with the average stock price being the average closing stock price for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the beginning of each of the performance period and the maturity date, as reported on the stock exchange on which such shares are listed. We believe utilizing an incentive award such as the performance units, based on total shareholder return, is an appropriate vehicle to align the interests of our officers who are entitled to receive such an award with the interests of our shareholders.

Each recipient will forfeit his or her Performance Unitsperformance units if the recipient's employment with Laredous is terminated by Laredothe Company for any reason or if the recipient resigns (in either case, other than for death or disability). If the employment is terminated due to death or disability, the recipient is entitled to receive a pro-rated Performance Unit.performance unit. Generally, grants of performance units will be made in the first quarter of each year.year, when our results of operations for the previous year have generally been determined and when our Compensation Committee is normally meeting to discuss short-term incentive payouts based on the prior-year results.


Table of Contents

        The grants made in the form of long-term incentive compensation to the named executive officers on February 3, 2012 are as follows:

 
 Restricted stock(1) Stock options(2) Performance units(3) 
Name
 # $ # $ # $ 

Randy A. Foutch

  31,780  766,216  62,868  849,824  13,500  1,634,855 

Richard C. Buterbaugh(4)

             

W. Mark Womble

  11,329  273,142  22,411  302,945  4,813  582,856 

Jerry R. Schuyler

  12,138  292,647  24,012  324,585  5,156  624,394 

Patrick J. Curth

  10,681  257,519  21,131  285,643  4,538  549,554 

John E. Minton

  6,474  156,088  12,806  173,108  2,750  333,026 

Name
 Restricted stock Stock options Performance units 

Randy A. Foutch

  31,780  62,868  13,500 

Jerry R. Schuyler

  12,138  24,012  5,156 

W. Mark Womble

  11,329  22,411  4,813 

Patrick J. Curth

  10,681  21,131  4,538 

John E. Minton

  6,474  12,806  2,750 
(1)
Grant date fair value is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 3, 2012.

(2)
Stock option awards vest and become exercisable in four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the grant. We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted under our 2011 Plan. Please refer to Note D to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of stock option awards.

(3)
The amounts in the column represent the February 3, 2012 grant date fair value of the performance unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Please refer to Note B to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of performance unit awards.

(4)
Mr. Buterbaugh did not commence employment with the Company until June 1, 2012, at which time he was granted 37,401 shares of restricted stock which have a cliff-vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date.

Table of Contents


Pay mixLTIP Awards in 2013

        The charts set forth below demonstrategrants made in the allocationform of base salary, target annual cash bonus and target long-term incentive awards of our Chief Executive Officer and othercompensation to the named executive officers on February 15, 2013 are as follows:

 
 Restricted stock(1) Stock options(2) Performance units(3) 
Name
 # $ # $ # $ 

Randy A. Foutch

  49,450  857,463  128,709  1,244,307  18,425  1,450,681 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  16,506  286,214  42,961  415,325  6,150  484,217 

W. Mark Womble(4)

             

Jerry R. Schuyler

  17,190  298,075  44,742  432,548  6,405  504,294 

Patrick J. Curth

  12,805  222,039  33,330  322,221  4,771  375,642 

John E. Minton

  8,561  148,448  22,284  215,433  3,190  251,163 

(1)
Grant date fair value is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on NYSE on February 15, 2013.

(2)
Stock option awards vest and become exercisable in four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the grant. We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted under our 2011 Plan.

(3)
The amounts in the column represent the February 15, 2013 grant date fair value of the performance unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(4)
Mr. Womble was not provided a long-term incentive award based on his retirement in December 31, 2011, following adjustments2012.

        In addition to base salary increases and short-term incentive target increases described previously, FWC also proposed increasing long-term incentive targets as a percentage of base pay for Mr. Foutch to 500%, Mr. Schuyler to 300%, Mr. Buterbaugh to 300% and Mr. Minton to 220% for 2013. The decision was made toafter reviewing market median data for total compensation for executives in our peer group. The Compensation Committee and the Company's compensation program during 2011.


Chief Executive Officer

GRAPHIC


Other named executive officers combined

GRAPHICboard of directors approved the recommendation.


Other benefitsBenefits


Table of Contents


Employment, Severance or Change in Control Agreements

        We do not currently maintain any employment agreements. On November 9, 2011, the Company adopted the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, which provides severance payments and benefits to our named executive officers and eligible persons with the title of vice president and above, as determined by our Compensation Committee. The policy provides an eligible participant with a lump sum cash severance payment and continued health benefits in the event that the participant experiences a qualifying termination event within the one yearone-year period following the occurrence of a qualifying change in control event.event ("double trigger"). In the event that an eligible executive's employment is terminated without cause by the employer or for good reason by the executive within the one-year period following the occurrence of a change in control, the executive would become entitled to receive 100% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%, and in the case of our other named executive officers, 200%) of the executive's base salary and 100% of the executive's target bonus. In addition, the executive would receive company paidCompany-paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to twelve months following the date of termination. The policy contains a modified cutback provision whereby payments payable to an executive may be reduced if doing so would put the executive in a better offmore advantageous after-tax provision than if payments were not reduced and the executive became subject to excise taxes. The Company believes that thesetaxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and loss of deduction under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. These severance levels are comparable to those utilized by our peer group.

        We believe that our Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, including its requirement of a "double trigger", provides suitable incentive for our officers to remain with the Cogent Peer Group.Company in the event of a potential change in control through the consummation of any such transaction. We further believe such an incentive is to the benefit of our stockholders as well as any potential purchaser in connection with a change in control transaction, as it helps to assure the continued operation and seamless transition of the Company prior to and through the conclusion of any such transaction. The compensation "multipliers" among the different categories of our officers were established based upon information provided by FWC regarding both our peer group and the industry in general.


Table of Contents


Other Matters

Risk assessment

        The Compensation Committee and management have reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and believe that our policies do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

        Our compensation philosophy and culture support the use of base salary, cash bonuses and long-term incentive equity compensation that are generally uniform in design and operation throughout


Table of Contents

our organization and with all levels of employees. In addition, the following specific factors, in particular, reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:

        Furthermore, prior to our corporate reorganization we provided our officers the opportunity to invest in our equity, which all of our named executive officers who were with the Company at the time did, and now we provide our officers with the opportunity to be awarded long-term incentive equity that continues to align their interests with those of our stockholders.

        In summary, because the Compensation Committee focuses on the Company's performance, with only some consideration given to the specific individual performance of the employee when making compensation decisions, we believe our historical compensation programs did not, and our current compensation programs do not, encourage excessive and unnecessary risk taking by executive officers (or other employees). These programs were and are designed to encourage employees to remain focused on both our shortshort- and long-term operational and financial goals. We set performance goals that we believe are reasonable in light of our past performance and market conditions. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor all levels of compensation to attempt to ensure that no element of compensation encourages excessive and unnecessary risk-taking.


Equity ownership guidelines

        The Compensation Committee recommended and the board of directors approved stock ownership guidelines for directors and the executive management team in order to further align the interest of our directors and officers with those of our stockholders. Effective as of the consummation of our initial public offering, individuals have three years to reach the following stock ownership guidelines (as a multiple of base salary): (i) Chief Executive Officer: 5x, (ii) President and Chief Operating Officer: 3x, (iii) Executive and Senior Vice President: 2x, (iv) Vice President: 1x and (v) directors: $400,000 worth of Company stock. Stock actually owned, as well as stock awarded under restricted stock awards, is included for purposes of satisfying these guidelines. No stock potentially exercisable under stock options is included. As of March 23,20, 2012, each of the named executive officers, as well as Ambassador Rooney, Mr. Parker, Ms. Pierce and Mr. Wolf, have achieved the stock ownership guidelines.


Tax and accounting implications

        Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) denies a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid to the chief executive officer and the three other most highly-paid executive officers (other than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) of a publicly-traded corporation. Certain types of compensation, including compensation based on performance criteria that are approved in advance by stockholders, are excluded from the deduction


Table of Contents

limit. In addition, "grandfather" provisions may apply to certain compensation arrangements, including the 2011 Plan, that were entered into by a corporation before it was publicly held. In view of these grandfather provisions, we believe that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code will not limit our tax deductions for executive compensation for the first three fiscal years following the consummation of our initial public offering. Going forward, our policy is to qualify compensation paid to our executive officers for deductibility for federal income tax purposes to the extent feasible. However, to retain highly skilled executives and remain competitive with other employers, the Compensation Committee will have the right to authorize compensation that would not otherwise be deductible under Section 162(m).


Policies against hedging and pledging stock

        Under the terms of our Insider Trading Policy that is applicable to our named executive officers, such persons are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of such person's common stock in the Company. We prohibit such conduct because to allow such activity the officer could then no longer be exposed to the full risks of ownership and may no longer have the same objectives as the Company's other stockholders.

        In addition, our named executive officers may not hold their Company securities in a margin account and may not, without prior approval, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan. The only exception to the prohibition on pledging securities may exist in the case of a non-margin loan where the officer was clearly able to demonstrate the financial ability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities, and only if such pledge was pre-approved by our General Counsel.


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Donald D. Wolf, Chairman
Ambassador Francis Rooney, Member
Peter R. Kagan, Member
Pamela S. Pierce, Member

The information contained in this Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.


Table of Contents


Summary Compensation

        The following table summarizes, with respect to our named executive officers, information relating to the compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.


Summary compensation table

Name and principal position
 Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus ($) Stock
awards
($)(2)(3)
 All other
compensation
($)(4)
 Total ($)  Year Salary ($)
(1)
 STIP bonus ($)
(1)
 Special bonus ($)
(2)(6)
 Restricted stock awards ($)
(3)
 Stock option awards ($)
(3)
 Performance unit awards ($)
(3)
 All other compensation ($)
(4)(5)
 Total ($) 

Randy A. Foutch,

 
2011
 
509,500
 
453,200
 
2,947,132
 
32,536

(5)
 
3,942,368
  2012 588,462 540,000 500,000 766,216 849,824 1,634,855 49,361 4,928,718 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 2010 452,100 453,200 0 183,408(5) 1,088,708  2011 509,500 551,000  2,947,132   32,536 4,040,168 
 2010 452,100 453,200     183,408 1,088,708 

Richard C. Buterbaugh,

 

2012

 

160,320

 

172,200

 

50,000

 

1,022,918

 


 


 

10,797

 

1,416,235

 

Executive Vice President and

 2011         

Chief Financial Officer

 2010         

W. Mark Womble,

 
2011
 
299,000
 
267,000
 
533,780
 
17,954
 
1,117,734
 
 

2012

 

343,269

 

192,000

 

262,500

 

273,142

 

302,945

 

582,856

 

23,083

 

1,979,795

 

Senior Vice President and Chief

 2010 266,350 267,000 0 17,022 550,372 

Financial Officer

 

Former Senior Vice President and

 2011 299,000 322,000  533,780   17,954 1,172,734 

Chief Financial Officer

 2010 266,350 267,000     17,022 550,372 

Jerry R. Schuyler,

 
2011
 
338,862
 
305,900
 
933,280
 
17,022
 
1,595,064
 
 

2012

 

367,788

 

286,880

 

281,250

 

292,647

 

324,585

 

624,394

 

22,196

 

2,199,740

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 2010 305,158 305,900 0 17,022 628,080  2011 338,862 343,000  933,280   17,022 1,632,164 
 2010 305,158 305,900     17,022 628,080 

Patrick J. Curth,

 
2011
 
292,333
 
267,000
 
576,420
 
15,274
 
1,151,027
 
 

2012

 

319,044

 

222,750

 

247,500

 

257,519

 

285,643

 

549,554

 

22,806

 

1,904,816

 

Senior Vice President—Exploration and

 2010 266,350 267,000 0 17,022 550,372 

Land

 

Senior Vice President—Exploration

 2011 292,333 304,000  576,420   15,274 1,188,027 

and Land

 2010 266,350 267,000     17,022 550,372 

John E. Minton,

 
2011
 
238,875
 
235,000
 
246,560
 
17,953
 
738,388
 
 

2012

 

267,932

 

173,250

 

41,250

 

156,088

 

173,108

 

333,026

 

19,773

 

1,164,427

 

Senior Vice President—Reservoir

 2010 220,083 235,000 0 16,983 472,066  2011 238,875 253,000  246,560   17,953 756,388 

Engineering

  2010 220,083 235,000     16,983 472,066 

(1)
Salary and STIP Bonus amounts in this table reflect the actual base salary paymentsalaries and STIP bonuses earned in 2012, 2011 and 2010.2010, even if paid in another year.

(2)
Laredo LLC awarded restricted unit awards to itsThe amounts in the column represent a one-time bonus paid in recognition of the singular efforts associated with the preparation and execution of the Company's successful initial public offering in December 2011. These bonuses were paid in early 2012 following a determination of the Compensation Committee with input from Mr. Foutch (for named executive officers prior to the corporate reorganizationother than himself), and initial public offering, at which time the vested restricted unit awards were exchanged for sharesapproval of the Company's common stock and the unvested restricted unit awards were exchanged for restricted sharesboard of the Company's common stock.directors.

(3)
The amounts reported under "Stock awards" reflectin the aggregatecolumn represent the grant date fair value forof the restricted stock awards, option awards, and performance unit awards granted to Laredo LLC's named executive officers and later exchanged for restricted shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering, calculatedcomputed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification topic 718, Compensation—Unit Compensation. Prior to the corporate reorganization and initial public offering, the restricted units vested 20% on the grant date and 20% on each of the next four anniversaries of the grant date.ASC Topic 718. Please refer to Note EB and Note D to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of restricted stock awards, option awards and performance unit awards.

(4)
Includes the aggregate value of matching contributions to our 401(k) plan and the dollar value of life insurance coverage. The amounts of matching contributions to our 401(k) plan that our named executive officers received during 20112012 are as follows: (a) Messrs.Mr. Foutch Womble and Schuyler each received $14,700; (b) Mr. Buterbaugh received $9,681; (c) Mr. Womble received $19,587; (d) Mr. Schuyler received $19,919; (e) Mr. Curth received $12,745;$19,310; and (c)(f) Mr. Minton received $14,389.$16,277.

(5)
During the years 2012, 2011 and 2010, $31,166, $14,996 and $166,386, respectively, are the portions of expenses that were paid by us, which would otherwise have been paid by Mr. Foutch, for the use of his personally owned aircraft not directly related to Laredo's business. These payments represent only a partial refund of the total costs of flying the aircraft. For further details, please see "Transactions with Related Persons—Other Related PartyRelated-Party Transactions."

(6)
Mr. Buterbaugh was hired as the Senior Vice President—Investor Relations on June 1, 2012 and was awarded a signing bonus of $50,000.

Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 20112012

        The following table provides information concerning each stock award, including the exchanged restricted unit awards (referred to in the table collectively as "stock awards") granted to our named executive officers under any plan that were transferred during the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.


Grants of plan-based awards table for the year ended December 31, 20112012

  
 Restricted stock(1) Stock options(2) Performance units(3) 
Name
 Grant
date
 All other
stock awards(1)
 Grant date
fair value of
stock and
option awards(2)
  Grant date # $(4) # $(4) # $(4) 

  
 (#)
 ($)
 

Randy A. Foutch

 4/11/2011 35,924 327,600  2/3/2012 31,780 766,216 62,868 849,824 13,500 1,634,855 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 6/1/2012 37,410 762,790     

 
8/10/2011
 
101,815
 
2,619,532
  12/17/2012 14,780 260,128     

W. Mark Womble

 
4/11/2011
 
6,501
 
59,280
  2/3/2012 11,329 273,142 22,411 302,945 4,813 582,856 

 
8/10/2011
 
18,445
 
474,500
 

Jerry R. Schuyler

 
4/11/2011
 
11,405
 
104,000
  2/3/2012 12,138 292,647 24,012 324,585 5,156 624,394 

 
8/10/2011
 
32,233
 
829,280
 

Patrick J. Curth

 
4/11/2011
 
7,013
 
63,960
  2/3/2012 10,681 257,519 21,131 285,643 4,538 549,554 

 
8/10/2011
 
19,915
 
512,460
 

John E. Minton

 
4/11/2011
 
3,022
 
27,560
  2/3/2012 6,474 156,088 12,806 173,108 2,750 333,026 

 
8/10/2011
 
8,516
 
219,000
 

(1)
RepresentsRestricted shares granted in 2012 vest 33%, 33% and 34% per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant, with the exception that the 37,410 shares of restricted common stock of the Company, for which unvested restricted unitgranted to Mr. Buterbaugh at his June 1, 2012 hire date have a three-year cliff vest.

(2)
Stock option awards of Laredo LLC granted during the year ended December 31, 2011 were exchangedvest and become exercisable in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering. The restricted common stock awards noted have maintained the same vesting schedule as the initial restricted unit awards from which they were exchanged and vest 20% on the grant date and 20%four equal installments on each of the nextfirst four anniversaries of the grant date.date of the grant.

(2)(3)
The performance units issued have a performance period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and are expected to be paid in 2015 if the performance criteria is met.

(4)
The amounts in the column represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards, option awards, and performance unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Please refer to Note EB and Note D to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of stock awards.


Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

        The following is a discussion of material factors necessary to an understanding of the information disclosed in the "Summary compensation table" and the "Grants of plan-based awards table for the year ended December 31, 2011" set forth above.


Restrictedrestricted stock awards,

        The stock awards reflected above in the "Grants of plan-based awards table for the year ended December 31, 2011" includes restricted units in Laredo LLC. These restricted units were intended to constitute "profits interests" in Laredo LLC that would participate solely in any future profits and distributions of Laredo LLC. In connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering, these unvested restricted units were exchanged for shares of our restricted common stock.


Table of Contents


Base salary and cash bonusoption awards and equity awards in proportion to total compensation

        The following table sets forth the approximate percentage of each named executive officer's total compensation that Laredo paid in the form of (i) base salary and cash bonus awards and (ii) equity awards during fiscal year 2011 as set forth in the "Summary compensation table". We view the various components of compensation as related but distinct and emphasize "performance" by tying significant portions of total compensation to short- and long-term financial and strategic goals, currently in the form of base salaries, annual cash bonus awards and long-term plan-based incentiveperformance unit awards. Our compensation philosophy is designed to align the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders. While the current value of the cash compensation components outweighs the current value of the incentive-based grant of the restricted units, which unvested restricted units were exchanged in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering into shares of our restricted common stock, this proportion does not reflect the concept that the future value of our equity is an incentive for the long-term success of the Company. For more information regarding the restricted unit awards, see the "Grants of plan-based awards table for the year ended December 31, 2011" above. We also attempt to set each officer's base salary in line with comparable positions with our peers and to award an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of overall company strategic goals and each individual's relative contribution to those goals.

Name
 Base salary and cash bonus
awards as a percentage
of total compensation
 Equity awards as a
percentage of total compensation
 

Randy A. Foutch

  24% 75%

W. Mark Womble

  51% 48%

Jerry R. Schuyler

  40% 59%

Patrick J. Curth

  49% 50%

John E. Minton

  64% 33%

*
The remaining portions of the named executive officers' total compensation were attributable to all other compensation paid for 2011.


Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

        The Company adopted the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in 2011. The purpose of the 2011 Plan is to provide a means for the Company to attract and retain key personnel and for the Company's directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors to acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and aligning their interests with those of the Company's stockholders. Under the 2011 Plan, awards of stock options, including both incentive stock options and nonstatutorynon-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock bonus awards and Performance Unitsperformance units may be granted. Subject to adjustment for certain corporate events, 10 million shares is the maximum number of shares of our common stock authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan.


Table of Contents

        Eligibility.    Our employees, consultants and directors and those of our affiliated companies, as well as those whom we reasonably expect to become our employees, consultants and directors or those of our affiliated companies are eligible for awards, provided that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. A written agreement between us and each participant will evidence the terms of each award granted under the 2011 Plan.


Table of Contents

        Shares subject to the 2011 Plan.    The shares that may be issued pursuant to awards will be our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and the maximum aggregate amount of common stock which may be issued upon exercise of all awards under the 2011 Plan, including incentive stock options, may not exceed 10 million shares, subject to adjustment to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in our capital structure. In addition, the maximum number of shares with respect to which stock options and/or stock appreciation rights may be granted to any participant in any one year period is limited to 10 million shares, the maximum number of shares with respect to which incentive stock options may be granted under the 2011 Plan may not exceed 10 million shares, no more than 10 million shares may be earned in respect of Performance Unitsperformance units denominated in shares granted to any single participant for a single calendar year during a performance period, or in the event that the Performance Unitperformance unit is paid in cash, other securities, other awards or other property, no more than the fair market value of 10 million shares of common stock on the last day of the performance period to which the award related, and the maximum amount that can be paid to any single participant in one calendar year pursuant to a cash bonus award is $5 million, in each case, subject to adjustment for certain corporate events.

        If any award under the 2011 Plan expires or otherwise terminates, in whole or in part, without having been exercised in full, the common stock withheld from issuance under that award will become available for future issuance under the 2011 Plan. If shares issued under the 2011 Plan are reacquired by us pursuant to the terms of any forfeiture provision, those shares will become available for future awards under the 2011 Plan. Awards that can only be settled in cash will not be treated as shares of common stock granted for purposes of the 2011 Plan.

        Administration.    Our board of directors, or a committee of members of our board of directors appointed by our board of directors, may administer the 2011 Plan, and that administrator is referred to in this summary as the "administrator." Among other responsibilities, the administrator selects participants from among the eligible individuals, determines the number of shares of common stock that will be subject to each award and determines the terms and conditions of each award, including exercise price, methods of payment and vesting schedules. Our board of directors may amend or terminate the 2011 Plan at any time. Amendments will not be effective without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable law or stock exchange requirements.

        Adjustments in capitalization.    Subject to the terms of an award agreement, if there is a specified type of change in our common stock, such as extraordinary cash dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization, appropriate equitable adjustments or substitutions will be made to the various limits under, and the share terms of, the 2011 Plan and the awards granted thereunder, including the maximum number of shares reserved under the 2011 Plan, the maximum number of shares with respect to which any participant may be granted awards and the number, price or kind of shares of common stock or other consideration subject to awards to the extent necessary to preserve the economic intent of the award. In addition, subject to the terms of an award agreement, in the event of certain mergers, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, our reorganization or liquidation, or our agreement to enter into any such transaction, the administrator may cancel outstanding awards and cause participants to receive, in cash, stock or a combination thereof, the value of the awards.

        Change in control.    In the event of a change in control, all options and stock appreciation rights subject to an award will become fully vested and immediately exercisable and any restricted period


Table of Contents

imposed upon restricted awards will expire immediately (including a waiver of applicable performance goals). Accelerated exercisability and lapse of restricted periods will, to the extent practicable, occur at a time which allows participants to participate in the change in control. In the event of a change of control, all incomplete performance periods will end, the administrator will determine the extent to


Table of Contents

which performance goals have been met, and such awards will be paid based upon the degree to which performance goals were achieved.

        Nontransferability.    In general, each award granted under the 2011 Plan may be exercisable only by a participant during the participant's lifetime or, if permissible under applicable law, by the participant's legal guardian or representative. Except in very limited circumstances, no award may be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered by a participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and any such purported assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance will be void and unenforceable against us. However, the designation of a beneficiary will not constitute an assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance.

        Section 409A.    The provisions of the 2011 Plan and the awards granted under the 2011 Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder so as to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.


Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20112012 Fiscal Year-End

        The following table provides information concerning restricted stock awards, stock options and performance unit awards that had not vested for our named executive officers as of December 31, 2011.2012. With respect to grant dates prior to 2012, the dates reflect the grant date of restricted units that were converted into restricted stock at the time of our corporate reorganization.


Outstanding equity awards table as of December 31, 20112012

Name
 Shares not
vested(1)(2)
 Market value
of shares
not vested(3)
  Grant Date Restricted Stock Shares Not Vested(1)(2) Market Value of Shares Not Vested(3) Performance Units Not Vested(4) Market Value of Performance Units Not Vested(5) Stock Options Not Exercisable(6) Stock Options Exercisable Exercise Price Expiration Date 

Randy A. Foutch

 2/3/2012 31,780 $577,125 13,500 $1,544,060 62,868  $24.11 2/3/2022 

 (#)
 ($)
  8/10/2011 61,085 $1,109,304  $   $  

Randy A. Foutch

 240,766 5,369,082 

 4/11/2011 21,554 $391,421  $   $  

 2/1/2010 33,671 $611,465  $   $  

 4/7/2009 16,706 $303,381  $   $  

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 
12/17/2012
 
14,780
 
$

268,405
 
 
$

 
 
 
$

 
 

 6/1/2012 37,410 $679,366  $   $  

W. Mark Womble

 48,134 1,073,338  
2/3/2012
 
11,329
 
$

205,735
 
4,813
 
$

550,486
 
22,411
 
 
$

24.11
 
2/3/2022
 

 8/10/2011 11,065 $200,940  $   $  

 4/11/2011 3,901 $70,842  $   $  

 2/1/2010 6,113 $111,012  $   $  

 4/7/2009 3,034 $55,097  $   $  

Jerry R. Schuyler

 85,256 1,901,209  
2/3/2012
 
12,138
 
$

220,426
 
5,156
 
$

589,716
 
24,012
 
 
$

24.11
 
2/3/2022
 

 8/10/2011 19,338 $351,178  $   $  

 4/11/2011 6,843 $124,269  $   $  

 2/1/2010 10,676 $193,876  $   $  

 4/7/2009 5,303 $96,302  $   $  

Patrick J. Curth

 47,765 1,065,160  
2/3/2012
 
10,681
 
$

193,967
 
4,538
 
$

519,033
 
21,131
 
 
$

24.11
 
2/3/2022
 

 8/10/2011 11,949 $216,994  $   $  

 4/11/2011 4,208 $76,417  $   $  

 2/1/2010 6,593 $119,729  $   $  

 4/7/2009 3,273 $59,438  $   $  

John E. Minton

 21,928 488,994  
2/3/2012
 
6,474
 
$

117,568
 
2,750
 
$

314,531
 
12,806
 
 
$

24.11
 
2/3/2022
 

 8/10/2011 5,107 $92,743  $   $  

 4/11/2011 1,813 $32,924  $   $  

 2/1/2010 3,079 $55,915  $   $  

 4/7/2009 1,482 $26,913  $   $  

(1)
RepresentsRestricted shares granted in 2012 vest 33%, 33% and 34% per year beginning on the numberfirst anniversary date of the grant, with the exception that the 37,410 shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Buterbaugh at his June 1, 2012 hire date have a three-year cliff vest.

(2)
Restricted shares of common stock of the Company,which were issued in exchange for which previously unvested restricted units in Laredo LLC were exchanged in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering. As described below under "—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," the restricted stock awards may terminate upon the officer's termination of employment. Please see footnote 2 below for a description of the vesting schedule for the restricted stock awards that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

(2)
The restricted stock awards noted aboveoffering, have maintained the same vesting schedule as the initial restricted unit awards for which they were exchanged in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering and vest 20% on the grant date and 20% on each of the next four anniversaries of the grant date.

(3)
Market value is determined based on a market value of our common stock of $22.30,$18.16, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")NYSE on December 30, 2011,31, 2012, the last trading day of the year.

(4)
The performance units issued have a performance period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and are expected to be paid in 2015 if the performance criteria is met.

(5)
The amounts in the column represent the December 31, 2012 fair value of the performance unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Please refer to Note B to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of performance unit awards.

(6)
Stock option awards vest and become exercisable in four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the grant. Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, we utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted under our 2011 Plan.

Table of Contents


Registration Rights

        We are a party to a registration rights agreement pursuant to which we have granted certain registration rights to the members of Laredo LLC that received shares of our common stock in the corporate reorganization. Pursuant to the lock-up agreements, certain


Table of these stockholders have agreed not to exercise those rights during the lock-up period following our initial public offering without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.Contents


Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 20112012

        The following table provides information concerning the vesting of stock awards, including the exchanged restricted unit awards (referred to in the table collectively as "stock awards"), during fiscal year 20112012 on an aggregated basis with respect to each of our named executive officers.officers (except Mr. Buterbaugh).


Stock vested for the year ended December 31, 20112012


 Stock awards  Stock awards 
Name
 Shares acquired
on vesting(1)
 Value realized on
vesting(2)
  Shares acquired on
vesting(1)
 Value realized on
vesting(2)
 

 (#)
 ($)
 

Randy A. Foutch

 237,064 2,239,716  105,056 $2,416,015 

W. Mark Womble

 43,039 367,058  24,021 $548,410 

Jerry R. Schuyler

 74,666 630,542  43,096 $982,931 

Patrick J. Curth

 46,462 433,414  21,742 $499,409 

John E. Minton

 18,055 149,732  10,447 $239,746 

(1)
Represents the number of vested shares of common stock in the Company, for which restricted unit awards in Laredo LLC that vested during the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, were exchanged in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering. There were no payroll taxes withheld from these awards.

(2)
The value realized upon vesting was calculated asutilizing the gross number of units in Laredo LLC (which were exchanged for shares of commonending stock ofprice on the Company in connection with our corporate reorganization and initial public offering) that vested during the year, multiplied by the fair market value of the units at the time of vesting. Please refer to Note E to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of stock awards.vesting date.


Pension Benefits

        We maintain a 401(k) Plan for our employees, including our named executive officers, but at this time we do not sponsor or maintain a pension plan for any of our employees.


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

        We do not provide a deferred compensation plan for our employees at this time.


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

        As described above, we do not maintain individual employment agreements. The Company has adopted the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, which provides severance payments and benefits to our named executive officers and eligible persons with the title of vice president and above, as determined by our Compensation Committee. The policy provides


Table of Contents

an eligible participant with a lump sum cash severance payment and continued health benefits in the event that the participant experiences a qualifying termination within the one yearone-year period following the occurrence of a qualifying change in control event. In the event that an eligible executive's employment is terminated without cause by the employer or for good reason by the employee within the one-year period following the occurrence of a change in control, the executive would become entitled to receive 100% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%, and in the case of our other named executive officers, 200%) of the executive's base salary and 100% of the executive's target bonus. In addition, the executive would receive company paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to twelve months following the date of termination. The policy contains a modified cutback provision whereby payments payable to an executive may be reduced if doing so would put the executive in a better offmore advantageous after-tax provision than if payments were not reduced and the executive became subject to excise taxes.


Table of Contents

In order to be eligible for severance benefits under the policy, our named executive officers have executed a confidentiality, non-disparagement and non-solicitation agreement.

        In addition, eachEach of the named executive officers has beenwho was with the Company prior to our corporate reorganization was awarded restricted units by Laredo LLC and the unvested restricted units were exchanged into shares of restricted stock in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering.offering in 2011. The terms of the restricted stock awards following the exchange are described below.

        The restricted stock may be affected by a named executive officer's termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. In the event of the termination of a named executive officer's employment by the Company, with or without cause, or the named executive officer's resignation for any reason, the named executive officer will forfeit all restricted stock to us.

        If the named executive officer's employment with the Company is terminated upon the death of the named executive officer or because the named executive officer is determined to be disabled by the board of directors, then all of his restricted stock will automatically vest. A named executive officer will be considered to have incurred a "disability" in the event of the officer's inability to perform, even with reasonable accommodation, on a full-time basis the employment duties and responsibilities due to accident, physical or mental illness, or other circumstance; provided, however, that such inability continues for a period exceeding 180 days during any 12-month period.

        In the event of a change of control, all restricted stock will become fully vested as of the date of the change of control, provided that the named executive officer remains employed by the Company through the date of such change of control. For purposes of these restricted stock awards, a "change of control" generally means: (i) any person acquires beneficial ownership of our securities representing 40% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding securities (provided, however, that if the surviving entity becomes a subsidiary of another entity, then the outstanding securities shall be deemed to refer to the outstanding securities of the parent entity), (ii) a majority of the members of the board of directors who were directors as of the date of the corporate reorganization no longer serve as directors; or (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of our company with any other entity, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent more than 40% of the combined voting power of our voting securities outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

   ��    Stock options may be affected by a named executive officer's termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. The unvested portion of a stock option shall expire upon termination of employment, and the vested portion of a stock option shall remain exercisable for (i) one year following termination of employment by reason of the holder's death or disability, but not later than the expiration of the option period, or (ii) ninety (90) days following termination of employment for any reason other than the holder's death or disability, and other than the holder's termination of employment for cause. Both the unvested and the vested but unexercised portion of a stock option shall expire upon the termination of the option holder's employment or service by the Company for cause.

        In the event of a change of control (which for these purposes is the same as described above), provided that the named executive officer remains employed by the Company through the date of such change of control, all stock options will become fully vested and exercisable with respect to all shares of common stock covered thereby as of the date of the change of control.


Table of Contents

        Performance unit awards may be affected by a named executive officer's termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. If the executive's employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for any reason, with or without cause, or the executive resigns (in either case, other than by reason of death or disability) prior to the maturity date of the performance unit award, then no amount shall be paid in respect of the award. If, prior to the maturity date, the executive's employment with the Company terminates either by reason of death or or because the executive is determined by the board of directors or the Compensation Committee to be subject to a disability, then the executive shall be eligible to receive a pro-rated performance unit award, taking into account the time that the executive was employed during the performance period prior to the date of such termination.

        In the event of a change of control (which for these purposes is the same as described above), provided that the named executive officer remains employed by the Company through the date of such change of control, the "performance periods" in effect on the date the change of control occurs shall end on such date, and either the board of directors or the Compensation Committee shall determine the extent to which the performance goals with respect to each such performance period have been met, based upon such audited or unaudited financial information or other information then available as it deems relevant. The board of directors or Compensation Committee shall then cause each holder of performance unit awards to receive partial or full payment of such awards for each performance period, based on the board of directors' or Compensation Committee's determination of the degree of attainment of the performance goals or that the applicable "target" levels of performance have been attained or on such other basis determined by the board of directors or Compensation Committee.


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table for Fiscal Year 20112012

        The information set forth in the table below is based on the assumption that the applicable triggering event under the Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. Change in Control Executive Severance Plan or the applicable restricted stock, stock option or performance unit award agreement to which each named officer was a party occurred on December 31, 2011,2012, the last business day of fiscal year 2011.2012. Accordingly, the information reported in the table indicates the amount of cash severance and benefits that would be payable, and the value of restricted stock, stock options and performance units that would vest or become exercisable, by reason of a termination under the circumstances described above, or


Table of Contents

upon a change in control, and is our best estimation of our obligations to each named executive officer and will only be determinable with any certainty upon the occurrence of the applicable event. For purposes of determining the value of the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards, the fair market value per share of our common stock was $22.30$18.16 on December 31, 2011.2012. For purposes of determining the value of the accelerated vesting of stock options, we utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model at grant date. For purposes of determining the value of the accelerated vesting of the performance units, we utilized the December 31, 2012 fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.


Table of Contents

Name
 Termination
without
cause/for
good reason
outside of a
change in
control
 Change in control
(must be coupled
with Termination
without cause/for
good reason)(1)
 Change in
control only
 Termination
for cause
 Termination due
to death or
disability
  Termination without
cause/for good
reason outside of a
change in control
 Change in control
(must be coupled with Termination
without cause/for
good reason)(1)
 Change in
control only
 Termination
for cause
 Termination due
to death or
disability
 

Randy A. Foutch

  

Salary

 $ $1,800,000 $ $ $  $ $1,800,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  600,000      600,000    

Accelerated Equity(2)

  5,369,082 5,369,082  5,369,082 

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  2,992,696 2,992,696  2,992,696 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

  849,824 849,824   

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

  1,544,060 1,544,060  515,626 

Continued Medical

  19,720    
           

Total

 $ $7,806,300 $5,386,580 $ $3,508,322 
           

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 

Salary

 $ $820,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  328,000    

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  947,771 947,771  947,771 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

      

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

      

Continued Medical

  17,646      14,974    
                      

Total

 $ $7,786,728 $5,369,082 $ $5,369,082  $ $2,110,745 $947,771 $ $947,771 
                      

W. Mark Womble

  

Salary

 $ $700,000 $ $ $  $ $700,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  280,000      280,000    

Accelerated Equity(2)

  1,073,388 1,073,388  1,073,388 

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  643,626 643,626  643,626 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

  302,945 302,945   

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

  550,486 550,486  183,830 

Continued Medical

  13,374      14,974    
                      

Total

 $ $2,066,762 $1,073,388 $ $1,073,388  $ $2,492,031 $1,497,057 $ $827,456 
                      

Jerry R. Schuyler

  

Salary

 $ $750,000 $ $ $  $ $750,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  318,750      318,750    

Accelerated Equity(2)

  1,901,209 1,901,209  1,901,209 

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  986,051 986,051  986,051 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

  324,585 324,585   

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

  589,716 589,716  196,931 

Continued Medical

  17,646      $14,974    
                      

Total

 $ $2,987,605 $1,901,209 $ $1,901,209  $ $2,984,076 $1,900,352 $ $1,182,982 
                      

Patrick J. Curth

  

Salary

 $ $650,000 $ $ $  $ $660,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  231,000      247,500    

Accelerated Equity(2)

  1,065,160 1,065,160  1,065,160 

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  666,545 666,545  666,545 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

  285,643 285,643   

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

  519,033 519,033  173,327 

Continued Medical

  13,374      14,974    
                      

Total

 $ $1,969,534 $1,065,160 $ $1,065,160  $ $2,393,695 $1,471,221 $ $839,872 
                      

John E. Minton

  

Salary

 $ $520,000 $ $ $  $ $550,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

  156,000      192,500    

Accelerated Equity(2)

  488,994 488,994  488,994 

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

  326,063 326,063  326,063 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

  173,108 173,108   

Accelerated Equity PU(2)

  314,531 314,531  105,035 

Continued Medical

  13,374      14,974  $ $ 
                      

Total

 $ $1,178,368 $488,994 $ $488,994  $ $1,571,176 $813,702 $ $431,098 
                      

(1)
Our Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, which was applicable to each of the named executive officers at December 31, 2011,2012, provides that in the event that during the twelve month12-month period following a change in control the employment of a named executive officer is terminated by the employer without cause or by the named executive officer for good reason, then the named executive officer is entitled to 200% (300% in the case of Mr. Foutch) of such named executive officer's base salary and 100% of such named executive officer's targetedtarget bonus, plus company

Table of Contents


Table of Contents

(2)
At December 31, 2011,2012, the only formforms of equity awards held by the named executive officers consisted of restricted stock.stock, stock options and performance units. Each such award may be impacted by the termination of the holder's employment by the Company, depending on the reason for such termination, as follows: (i) The named executive officers' restricted stock awards provide that if the named executive officer's employment is terminated for any reason other than death or a determination of disability, then the named executive officer forfeits his unvested shares. In the event of termination by death or disability, all unvested shares automatically vest.vest; (ii) the stock option awards provide that the unvested portion of a stock option shall expire upon termination of employment, and the vested portion of a stock option shall remain exercisable for (a) one year following termination of employment by reason of the holder's death or disability, but not later than the expiration of the option period, or (b) 90 days following termination of employment for any reason other than the holder's death or disability, and other than the holder's termination of employment for cause; provided both the unvested and the vested but unexercised portion of a stock option shall expire upon the termination of the option holder's employment or service by the Company for cause; and (iii) the performance unit awards provide that if the executive's employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for any reason, with or without cause, or the executive resigns (in either case, other than by reason of death or disability) prior to the maturity date of the performance unit award, then no amount shall be paid in respect of the award. If, prior to the maturity date the executive's employment with the Company either by reason of death or or because the executive is determined by the board of directors or the Compensation Committee to be subject to a disability, then the executive shall be eligible to receive a pro-rated performance unit award, taking into account the time that the executive was employed during the performance period prior to the date of such termination.


Compensation of Directors

        For the portion of the 2011 fiscal year prior to our initial public offering, the members of our board of directors (then as members of the board of managers of Laredo LLC) did not receive cash or equity compensation for their services as managers. The independent managers were eligible to receive restricted units under Laredo's long-term plan-based incentive program. However, the managers appointed by Warburg Pincus received no equity compensation for their services as managers. No restricted shares of the Company's common stock were awarded to directors in 2011 subsequent to the Company's initial public offering.

        The following table summarizes, with respect to our non-employee directors, information relating to the compensation earned for services rendered as directors/managers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.


Director compensation table for the year ended December 31, 2011

Name
 Stock awards(1) All other compensation Total 
 
 ($)
 ($)
 ($)
 

Jeffrey Harris(2)

       

Peter R. Kagan

       

James R. Levy

       

B.Z. (Bill) Parker(3)

  51,920    51,920 

Pamela S. Pierce(3)

  51,920    51,920 

Ambassador Francis Rooney(4)

  37,758    37,758 

Donald D. Wolf(4)

  37,758    37,758 

Edmund P. Segner, III(5)

  103,806    103,806 

(1)
The amounts reported as "Stock awards" represent the grant date fair value of restricted unit awards granted to or in respect of Laredo's directors/managers during 2011 and which were exchanged for shares of common stock in the Company in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering. The fair value of the restricted unit awards was determined to be the same as the fair value of the common stock issued immediately before and after the corporate reorganization, which resulted in the aggregate grant date fair values of the restricted unit awards being carried forward as the basis in the restricted common stock issued in the corporate reorganization. See footnote 3 to the "Summary compensation table" for a description of the calculation of the grant date fair value for the restricted unit awards granted during 2011.

(2)
Mr. Harris, an affiliate of Warburg Pincus, retired from Laredo LLC's board of managers in August 2011.

(3)
At December 31, 2011, the director held 4,066 restricted shares of common stock in the Company.

(4)
At December 31, 2011, the director held 3,863 restricted shares of common stock in the Company.

(5)
At December 31, 2011, the director held 2,328 restricted shares of common stock in the Company.

Table of Contents

Based on a competitive review by CogentFWC of outside director compensation paid by our peers and in connection with our initial public offering in December 2011, effective for the fiscal year ended 2012 and thereafter, the board of directors adopted the compensation arrangements described below, which will be paid to our outside directors for their service during 2012. However, the specific times at which such compensation will be paid have not yet been determined.below.

        Directors who are also employees of the Company will not receive any additional compensation for serving on our board of directors. Accordingly, the "Summary compensation table" reflects the total compensation received by Randy A. Foutch and Jerry R. Schuyler.


Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes, with respect to our non-employee directors, information relating to the compensation earned for services rendered as directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.


Director compensation table for the year ended December 31, 2012

Name
 Stock
awards(1)
 Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
 All other
compensation(2)
 Total 

Peter R. Kagan

 $274,142 $ $15 $274,157 

James R. Levy

 $274,142 $ $15 $274,157 

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

 $284,210 $ $15 $284,225 

Pamela S. Pierce

 $274,142 $ $15 $274,157 

Ambassador Francis Rooney

 $282,532 $ $15 $282,547 

Donald D. Wolf

 $262,548 $20,000 $ $282,548 

Edmund P. Segner, III

 $244,154 $30,000 $ $274,154 

Dr. Myles Scoggins

 $189,990 $ $15 $190,005 

(1)
The amounts reported as "Stock awards" represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted to or in respect of Laredo's directors during 2012, based on the closing price of our stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date.

(2)
The amounts shown represent either the value of fractional shares paid in cash to those directors electing to take restricted stock in lieu of cash, or in the cases of Messrs. Wolf and Segner, their election to receive the $10,000 cash payment with respect to a quarterly meeting.

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes, with respect to our non-employee directors, information relating to the outstanding unvested restricted shares of common stock earned by each director for services rendered. Restricted shares granted in 2012 have a one-year cliff vest. Restricted shares, which were issued in exchange for previously unvested restricted units in Laredo LLC in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering, have the same vesting schedule as the initial restricted unit awards for which they were exchanged and vest 20% on the grant date and 20% on each of the next four anniversaries of the grant date.

Name
Grant DateRestricted Stock Shares Not Vested

Peter R. Kagan

11/28/2012528

8/20/2012446

5/16/201211,966

James R. Levy


11/28/2012

528

8/20/2012446

5/16/201211,966

B.Z. (Bill) Parker


11/28/2012

528

8/20/2012446

5/16/201212,440

8/10/20111,090

4/11/2011342

2/1/2010684

4/7/2009342

Pamela S. Pierce


11/28/2012

528

8/20/2012446

5/16/201211,966

8/10/20111,089

4/11/2011342

2/1/2010684

4/7/2009342

Ambassador Francis Rooney


11/28/2012

528

8/20/2012446

5/16/201212,361

8/10/2011759

4/11/2011342

2/16/20101,597

Donald D. Wolf


5/16/2012

12,361

8/10/2011759

4/11/2011342

2/16/20101,597

Edmund P. Segner, III


5/16/2012

11,495

8/18/20111,746

Dr. Myles Scoggins


11/28/2012

528

8/20/2012446

5/16/20128,004

        Our independent directors may be reimbursed for their expenses to attend board meetings.


Table of Contents


Securities Authorized for Issuance under 2011 Plan

        At December 31, 2011,2012, a total of 10 million shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2011 Plan. In the table below, we describe certain information about these shares and the 2011 Plan which provides for their authorization and issuance. You can find a description of the 2011 Plan under "—Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan."

Plan category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(1))

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(1)

$10,000,000

Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders

Total

$
Plan category
 Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(1) 

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(1)

  459,469 $24.11  9,217,049 

Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders

       
         

Total

       9,217,049 
         

(1)
The Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan became effective upon consummation of the Company's initial public offering in December 2011. No awards were issued under the 2011 Plan in December 2011. See "—Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan" for more information.

Table of Contents


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        No member of the Compensation Committee has been at any time an employee of Laredo. None of the Company's executive officers serve on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on the Company's board of directors or Compensation Committee. No member of the Company's board of directors is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Company's executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors



Donald D. Wolf, Chairman
Ambassador Francis Rooney, Member
Peter R. Kagan, Member
Pamela S. Pierce, Member

The information contained in this Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Company has determined that: (1)(i) Messrs. Segner, Parker, SegnerWolf and WolfScoggins are independent, as defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act and under the standards set forth by the NYSE, and thatNYSE; (ii) Mr. Levy iswas permitted to serve as a member of the Audit Committee for a period of up to one year following the completion of our initial public offering; and (2)(iii) all current Audit Committee members are financially literate. In addition, Messrs. WolfSegner and SegnerWolf each qualify as an audit committee financial expert under the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act.

        TheUntil the election of Dr. Scoggins to the Audit Committee in place of Mr. Levy in November 2012, the Company is relyingrelied on the phase-in rules of the SEC and NYSE with respect to the independence of the Audit Committee. These rules permit an audit committee that has one member that is independent upon the effectiveness of the registration, a majority of members that are independent within 90 days thereafter and all members that are independent within one year thereafter. The Company does not believe its reliance on these phase-in rules will materially adversely affectaffected the Audit Committee's ability to act independently or to satisfy the other requirements of Rule 10A-3(d).


Table of Contents

        During the last fiscal year, and earlier this year in preparation for the filing with the SEC of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the Audit Committee:


Table of Contents

        As recommended by the NYSE's corporate governance rules, the Audit Committee also considered whether, to assure continuing auditor independence, it would be advisable to regularly rotate the audit firm itself. The Audit Committee has concluded that the current benefits to the Company from continued retention of Grant Thornton LLP warrant retaining the firm at this time. The Audit Committee will, however, continue to review this issue on an annual basis.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing actions and the responsibilities set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company's consolidated financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for the Company's financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The independent registered public accountants are responsible for expressing an opinion on those financial statements. Audit Committee members are not employees of the Company or accountants or auditors by profession. Therefore, the Audit Committee has relied, without independent verification, on management's representation that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the representations of the independent registered public accountants included in their report on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

        The Audit Committee meets regularly with management and the independent auditors, including private discussions with the independent registered public accountants, and receives the communications described above. The Audit Committee has also established procedures for (a)(i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (b)(ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by the Company's employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. However, this oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and


Table of Contents

regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants do not assure that the Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.

 Audit Committee of the Board of Directors


 

B.Z. (Bill) Parker, Chairman
Edmund P. Segner, III, MemberChairman
James R. Levy,B.Z. (Bill) Parker, Member
Donald D. Wolf, Member
Dr. Myles W. Scoggins, Member

        The information contained in this Audit Committee Report and references in this Proxy Statement to the independence of the Audit Committee members shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

        The board of directors believes that its fundamental responsibility is to promote the best interests of the Company and its stockholders by overseeing the management of the Company's business and affairs. Directors must exercise their business judgment and act in what they reasonably believe to be the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The board of directors is elected by the stockholders to oversee management and to assure that the long-term interests of the stockholders are being served. Directors must fulfill their responsibilities consistent with their fiduciary duties to the stockholders and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

        The board of directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to the Company's stockholders. The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines cover the following principal subjects:

        The "Corporate Governance Guidelines" are posted on our website atwww.laredopetro.com. www.laredopetro.com. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will beare being reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the board of directors for its approval.


Table of Contents

        The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.


Code of Conduct and Business Ethics

        The board of directors has adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics applicable to our employees, directors and officers and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. Any waiver of these codes may be made only by our board of directors and will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. A copy of the Code of Conduct and Business Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is available on our website atwww.laredopetro.com. www.laredopetro.com.


Board of Directors Leadership

        Mr. Foutch is Laredo's founder and has served as Laredo's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since its inception. He also served as Laredo's President from October 2006 to July 2008.

        The board of directors believes the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, which allows for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Company's strategy and business plans. As Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman is best suited to ensure that critical business issues are brought before the board of directors, which enhances the board of director's ability to develop and implement business strategies.

        To ensure a strong and independent board of directors, all directors of the Company, other than Mr. Foutch and Mr. Schuyler, are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards currently in effect. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that non-management directors shall meet in regular executive session without management present, and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mr. Parker,Segner, shall act as the Chairman of such meetings.

        Because Warburg Pincus owns a majority of the Company's outstanding common stock, the Company is a "controlled company" as that term is set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Under the NYSE rules, a "controlled company" may elect not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including: (1)(i) the requirement that a majority of the Company's board of directors consist of independent directors, (2)(ii) the requirement that the Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities, and (3)(iii) the requirement that the Company's Compensation Committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities. While these requirements will not apply to the Company as long as it remains a "controlled company," the Company's board of directors nonetheless consists of a majority of independent directors and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee consist entirely of independent directors within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards currently in effect. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee each have a written charter addressing such committee's purpose and responsibilities in accordance with NYSE listing standards.

        The board of directors currently consists of a single class of directors each serving one yearone-year terms. After Warburg Pincus no longer beneficially owns more than 50% of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock, the Company's board of directors will be divided into three classes of directors, with each class as nearly equal in number as possible, serving staggered three yearthree-year terms, and such directors being removable only for "cause."


Table of Contents


Communications with the Board of Directors

        Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the board of directors, or the Company's non-management directors as a group, by writing to them at Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. Comments or complaints relating to the Company's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the board of directors.


Director Independence

        The board of directors will annually reviewreviews and determinedetermines the independence of each director. In making its determination, the board of directors will carefully considerconsiders all facts and circumstances it deems relevant to the determination. Members of the board of directors have an affirmative obligation to promptly inform the Company's General Counsel of changes in their circumstances or any transactions or relationships that may impact their designation by the board of directors as "independent."

        The board of directors has assessed the independence of each non-employee director under the Company's guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The board of directors affirmatively determined that all seveneight of the incumbent non-employee directors (Messrs. Kagan, Levy, Parker, Rooney, Segner and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce) are independent, and that, if elected, Dr. Scoggins will also qualify as independent under the Company's guidelines and independence standards of the NYSE.

        In connection with its assessment of the independence of each non-employee director, the board of directors also determined that Messrs. Segner, Parker, Segner and Wolf and Dr. Scoggins meet the additional independence standards of the NYSE and SEC applicable to members of the Audit Committee. Those standards require that the director not be an affiliate of the Company and that the director not receive from the Company, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees except for fees for services as a director. TheDuring his tenure on the Audit Committee prior to November 28, 2012, the board of directors also determined that Mr. Levy doesdid not meet the additional independence standards of the SEC applicable to members of the Audit Committee because he is an affiliate of the Company due to his association with Warburg Pincus. However, under applicable SEC phase-in requirements, Mr. Levy iswas permitted to serve as a member of the Audit Committee for a period of up to one year following the completion of the Company's initial public offering.


Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

        Our independent directors meet regularly in executive session without management to review the performance of management and our Company and any related matters. The Chairman of our Audit Committee, Mr. Parker,Segner, serves as the Chairman and lead independent director of such meetings. Generally, executive sessions are held in conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings of our board of directors. We expect our board of directors to have at least four executive sessions each year.


Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

        The board of directors evaluated each of the members of the Audit Committee for financial literacy and the attributes of a financial expert on November 18, 2011.28, 2012. The board of directors determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that Messrs. WolfSegner and SegnerWolf are Audit Committee financial experts as defined by the SEC.


Table of Contents


Oversight of Risk Management

        The board of directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of the Company's objectives and to maintain stockholder value. The Audit


Table of Contents

Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company's exposure to financial risk and reviewing the steps the Company's management has taken to monitor and control such exposure. The Audit Committee meets at least four times per year, in addition to periodic meetings with management and internal and independent auditors to accomplish its purpose. Additionally, each of the committees of the board of directors considers the risks within its area of responsibilities. We believe that the leadership structure of our board of directors supports its effective oversight of the Company's risk management.


Attendance at Annual Meetings

        The board of directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. We anticipate that all of our directors will attend the Annual Meeting.


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of common stock as of March 23, 201220, 2013 by (i) beneficial owners of five percent or more of the Company's common stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each named executive officer of the Company and (iv) all of the Company's directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each person or entity named below is c/o Laredo Petroleum Holdings, Inc., 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1800, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.

Name of person or identity of group
 Number of
shares
 Percentage of
class(1)
  Number of
shares
 Percentage of
class(1)
 

Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P.(2)

 81,193,140 63.4%

Warburg Pincus Private Equity X O&G, L.P.(2)

 20,690,977 16.1%

Randy A. Foutch(3)

 1,488,594(4) 1.2%

Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P.(2)

 69,737,464 53.9%

Warburg Pincus Private Equity X O&G, L.P.(2)

 17,771,653 13.7%

RS Investment Management Co. LLC(3)

 9,989,248 7.7%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(4)

 6,931,400 5.4%

Randy A. Foutch(5)

 1,488,044(6) 1.2%

Jerry R. Schuyler

 464,550 0.4% 480,223 0.4%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 68,696 0.1%

W. Mark Womble

 269,569 0.2% 39,142  

Patrick J. Curth

 273,612 0.2% 195,953 0.2%

John E. Minton

 111,087 0.1% 104,648 0.1%

Peter R. Kagan(2)(5)

  %

James R. Levy

  %

Peter R. Kagan(2)(7)

 87,522,621 67.7%

James R. Levy(2)(8)

 13,504  

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

 63,324 0.0% 77,302 0.1%

Pamela S. Pierce

 72,251 0.1% 85,755 0.1%

Francis Rooney

 440,092(6) 0.3% 453,991(9) 0.4%

Myles W. Scoggins

 14,542  

Edmund P. Segner, III

 2,910 0.0% 14,405  

Donald D. Wolf

 22,841(7) 0.0% 35,202(10)  

Directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

 3,275,573 2.6%

Directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)(11)

 3,121,063 2.4%

(1)
Based upon an aggregate of 128,144,857129,362,696 shares outstanding as of March 23, 2012.20, 2013.

(2)
The stockholders are Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, together with an affiliated partnershipspartnership ("WP IX"), and Warburg Pincus Private Equity X O&G, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, together with an affiliated partnershipspartnership ("WP O&G"). The total number of shares owned by WPIXWP IX includes 3,064,551 shares of common stock owned by WP IX Finance LP,L.P., an affiliated Delaware limited partnership, or 2.4% of the common stock outstanding, and the total number of shares owned by WP O&G includes 641,420550,921 shares of common stock owned by Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P., an affiliated Delaware limited partnership, or less than 1% of the common stock outstanding. Warburg Pincus IX, LLC, a New York limited liability company ("WPIX LLC"), an indirect subsidiary of Warburg Pincus & Co., a New York general partnership ("WP"), is the general partner of WP IX. Warburg Pincus X, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP X GP") is the general partner of the WP O&G. Warburg Pincus X, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("WP X LLC") is the general partner of WP X GP. Warburg Pincus Partners LLC, a New York limited liability company ("WP Partners"), is the sole member of each of WPIX LLC and WP X LLC. WP is the managing member of WP Partners. Warburg Pincus LLC, a New York limited liability company ("WP LLC"), manages WP IX and WP O&G. Charles R. Kaye and Joseph P. Landy are Managing General Partners of WP and Managing Members and Co-Presidents of Warburg PincusWP LLC and may be deemed to control the Warburg Pincus entities.

Table of Contents

(3)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 15, 2013 by RS Investment Management Co. LLC, which disclosed that RS Investment Management Co. LLC, The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America and Guardian Investor Services LLC possess the shared dispositive power of the reported shares. The Schedule 13G further states that The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America is the parent company of Guardian Investor Services LLC, which in turn is the parent company of RS Investment Management Co. LLC. The address of RS Investment Management Co. LLC is 388 Market Street, Suite 1700, San Francisco, California 94111.

(3)(4)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2013 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. which disclosed that such entity possess sole dispositive power of the reported shares. The address of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 East Pratt St., Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(5)
Randy A. Foutch, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors, is a limited partner of certain affiliates of Warburg Pincus.


Table of Contents

(4)(6)
Includes (i) 275,000400,148 shares held equally among four family trusts, (ii) 500 shares held by Mr. Foutch's daughter and (iii) 32,033529,989 shares held by Lariat Ranch LLC, an entity of which Mr. Foutch owns approximately 80% and has shared voting power.

(5)(7)
Mr. Kagan, a director of the Company, is a partner of WP and a Managing Director and Member of Warburg Pincus LLC. Mr. Kagan may be deemed to have an indirect pecuniary interest (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act) in an indeterminate portion of the common stock owned by WP IX and WP O&G.

(6)(8)
Mr. Levy, a director of the Company, is a Partner of WP and a Managing Director and Member of Warburg Pincus LLC. Mr. Levy may be deemed to have an indirect pecuniary interest (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act) in an indeterminate portion of the common stock owned by WP IX and WP O&G.

(9)
Includes 434,265 shares held by Rooney Capital LLC.

(7)(10)
Includes 3,000 shares held by the Donald D Wolf 2007 Irrevocable Trust.

(11)
Does not include shares of common stock held by WP IX and WP O&G (as defined in footnote 2) in which Messrs. Kagan and Levy may be deemed to have an indirect pecuniary interest (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act).

Table of Contents


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Person Transactions